
In the span of a month, US legislators have introduced two separate bills that aim to ban US government agencies from buying, using, or contracting Chinese-made telecommunications equipment or services.
Congressman Mike Conaway (R-TX) introduced the first such bill on January 9 on the floor of the US House of Representatives.
The second bill was presented on the US Senate floor two days ago by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR), Little Marco Rubio (R-FL), and John Cornyn (R-TX).
US lawmakers fear China's spying
Chinese equipment manufacturers like Huawei, ZTE, Datang, and Zhongxing, are named in the two bills. The reasoning behind the two bills is that Chinese vendors have a close relationship with Chinese state officials, and their equipment may be used to breach and spy on US facilities.
Last month, after the first bill was introduced in the US House of Representatives, the Army's Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri pulled down all of its Hikvision surveillance cameras due to the same fears expressed in the bill.
"Chinese telecom companies, like Huawei, are directly linked to the Chinese government and communist party," said Sen. Rubio this week. "For national security reasons, we cannot allow a foreign adversary to embed their technology in U.S. government systems or critical infrastructure."
"Huawei is effectively an arm of the Chinese government, and it’s more than capable of stealing information from U.S. officials by hacking its devices," Sen. Cotton added. "There are plenty of other companies that can meet our technology needs, and we shouldn’t make it any easier for China to spy on us."
Crackdown on Chinese telecommunications companies
Despite a lack of palpable evidence that Huawei is in cohorts with Chinese authorities, the company, in particular, has been the subject of similar bans.
For example, in 2013, the Australian government banned Huawei from bidding on a $38 billion contract for the country's National Broadband Network (NBN).
Earlier this year, US authorities also pressured AT&T to drop plans to sell Huawei smartphones in the US. Backdoors in the company's chipsets and the cyber-security implications related to this issue were one of the reasons lawmakers intervened.
Fear of Chinese companies comes after the Chinese state has passed legislation forcing tech companies to hand over user data to state agencies. Many countries fear that Chinese intelligence may abuse these laws to obtain data from foreign nationals, rumors that Chinese companies have always denied, claiming that user data collection systems are only active in products shipped in China alone.
Huawei and the rest of Chinese equipment vendors are now facing a similar situation to the one that Kaspersky is already facing. Last fall, the US government also banned the use of Kaspersky software on US government computers, citing similar fears that the company might have been compromised by Russian intelligence agents, who used its infrastructure to steal US top-secret documents.
Comments
Warthog-Fan - 6 years ago
Looks like someone in government finally got a brain...
Exnor - 6 years ago
"Looks like someone in government finally got a brain..."
Agree i do. Even on a general consumer level we see keyloggers and other spyware crap on Lenovo and other PRC brands...
billmcct - 6 years ago
Where the hell would they get the equipment then? The US doesn't make any electronics.
Warthog-Fan - 6 years ago
Gee...maybe it's time for America to go back into the business of manufacturing things again.
Occasional - 6 years ago
Even if passed, that doesn't prevent China-made devices and components from being used to collect and forward data from non-government installations. They have always had a massive industrial espionage program. The ubiquity of IoT devices (even items you wouldn't think of as IoT - but that gather data, which might be accessed by less obvious means), adds a whole new dimension: by collecting data on individuals; which could be collated to provide intel on government and corporate installations and activities - the exercise monitor mapping story last month is an example.
mithrenithil - 6 years ago
I vaguely remember a story that during the cold war the US would wait for the USSR to accuse them of something and then find that they were doing it themselves. So morale of the story is that US equipment is most likely already been used to spy on people and they are just projecting their fears (warranted or not) on others!