Ah, Giedrius M, but you didn't answer the question.
I've seen you make some intelligent and helpful posts. But are you here to be helpful or just to try to rake in commissions?
I find your reply, both here and in your PM to me, to be disingenuous and some of it nonsensical. This is not a difference of opinion, let's deal with facts.
First I'll note that you appear to have edited the SmitfraudFix tutorial and some of your other webpages. I would like to think this is a step in the right direction, but I can't help but think otherwise. Nevertheless, that is speculation--here are he facts.
smithfraudfix is cure for symptoms, not to the fact that there are trojans installed which can download new version of parasites.
It is untrue that SF does not deal with the trojans that install rogue removal programs. Just the opposite. The trojan is what shows the false warnings--it is essentially a desktop hijack. Most of these rogue programs that are trying to trick you into buying will include an uninstall string that will show up in Add/Remove to give it an air of legitimacy. That may remove only the Scanner Program, but not the false warnings that the trojan initiated.
The symptoms won't go away until the trojan that is causing them is fixed. So it is nonsense to say that curing the symptoms doesn't do the job. That is the primary goal of most end users--make the symptoms go away. It is true, as I've already stated, that there may be other trojans or malware on a person's system, but SF does not claim to be a general scanner. This is why the advice to post a HijackThis log, after running some free
general scanners is sound, which you did not do.
For the most part, SF will remove all aspects of the Zlob trojan--all files and registry entries it knows about. Like most malware that we have to deal with today, this family of trojans changes file names and reg entries quite often so there is no guarantee that it will remove the symptoms in every case. Which is true of SpywareDoctor, SAS or any other general scanner that works on a set of definitions, whether anti-spyware or anti-virus. SF targets only certain families of SmitFraud, the developer works closely with the anti-malware community and therefore usually sees new variants earlier than others and updates the SF tool accordingly. I've seen it updated three times in one day. If you look at the tool's changelog you can see exactly what it fixes, and does it for free. Does SpwareDoctor show you every file and registry entry it will fix? If not, then it is speculation and inaccurate that it would be preferred as a means of removal over SF that is desgined for that specific job, which is what your tutorial implies.
I hate advocating pushing a cure for symptoms without checking HOW you got any parasite in the first place. Yes, I want people to use smithfraudfix as long as they CHECK how they got infected, duh.
How a person got infected in the first place has nothing to do with it's removal. Even if you are saying the trojan responsible is still there and will download and install more if not removed--I've just proved that to be a false assumption because SF will remove it. Knowing how one got infected is useful to know to prevent future infections. If you check the bleepingcomputer Spyware and Malware Removal Guides
you would see that how an infection got on a system in the first place is mentioned when known. For most of the latest variants, the trojan is part of a codec that the victim is told is needed in order to play a certain video.
The point here is that your SF guide is supposed to be a removal guide, not a prevention guide.
3. In your PM to me, you said, "I see people spamming everywhere that Smitfraud fix will fix this problem, and that problem." It is true that some people will recommend the wrong tool for the job. Some people are just guessing about how to fix a problem, I've seen a lot of people run CWShredder when there is no CWS on their system because they have either been told to try that or have seen it fix someone else's problem and will try anything in desperation. But to say SF is being spammed is just wrong. No one has anything to gain, either monetarily or otherwise by recommending a free tool in order to help someone.
Consider this. Lukage
asked how to remove System Doctor. According to The SF Changelog, SmitfraudFix does not remove this rogue and all its files at this point in time. So by your own definition, you just spammed the board by recommending SmitfrauFix for this problem because it is not the tool for the job in this case.
I had much more I intended to go into but I have had other things to do. I just know that I've run into several websites just like yours. I have to admit that you are more honest than most by not hiding that you have registered the domain. Others who use the same affiliate scheme hide behind a proxied domain. You are welcome here to talk computers, but not to lead people in a subtle way to your site where you hope the end result will be that people will purchase a general scanner when we can help people with free tools.