britechguy is right, Google Search is very handy - the problem with finding the exact solution is the time it takes
1. Looking through web search results usually (not always, but usually) cuts down on the time you spend on an issue "throwing switches willy-nilly hoping that something will work."
2. The vast majority of us who are in the technology servicing business do web searches and start scanning through the results when we encounter issues we have not encountered before because of the time it saves. Contrary to widely-held opinion, which some tech geeks try to nurture rather than disabuse, we do not "know everything" or have all the answers in our heads.
3. When we have a problem we've encountered that doesn't seem to have anyone that's put any sort of solution for online, we will post on blogs, in forums such as these, etc., outlining what we did to arrive at a solution. It's a way of giving back to the cyber community on which we depend and it makes you (for most yous, anyway) feel good to know that you are likely going to be helping someone else avoid tearing their hair out.
I get why people ask questions, as I do, too. But I generally always do a web search with my favorite search engine to see if that question has been asked before prior to asking it almost anywhere. When I make the very rare exception to that personal rule, I always preface it with, "I know this is probably out there somewhere, but I'm being lazy and hoping someone knows off the top of their head . . ."
Brian AKA Bri the Tech Guy (website in my user profile) - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134
. . . the presumption of innocence, while essential in the legal realm, does not mean the elimination of common sense outside it. The willing suspension of disbelief has its limits, or should.
~ Ruth Marcus, November 10, 2017, in Washington Post article, Bannon is right: It’s no coincidence The Post broke the Moore story