Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Why the different CPU/APU ID between utilities?


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 britechguy

britechguy

    Been there, done that, got the T-shirt


  • Moderator
  • 7,801 posts
  • ONLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Staunton, VA
  • Local time:11:28 PM

Posted 12 February 2018 - 09:46 PM

This is really a curiosity question, not a problem in any real way.

 

I have noticed in the past that for certain CPUs/APUs it seems that every single utility identifies them correctly, while for others they do not.

The APU in this laptop is an A12-9700P.  Some are identifying it correctly while others are identifying it as an A10-9700.  Speccy also insists it's an A10.

 

What I find really interesting what CPU-Z did in version 1.78.  It's text identification is A10 while the logo it pulls up is A12.  That seems to have been corrected with version 1.83.

 

Just curious if anyone knows what is queried, and why different conclusions are reached?

 

 

cpu-z_v1.78.jpg 
 
cpu-z_v1.83.jpg 
 
coretemp.jpg
 
hw_monitor_pro.jpg 
 

Brian  AKA  Bri the Tech Guy (website in my user profile) - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134 

      Memory is a crazy woman that hoards rags and throws away food.

                    ~ Austin O'Malley

 

 

 

              

 


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users