Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Upgrade i5 2500K to coffee lake i3-8100?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 sjs1978

sjs1978

  • Members
  • 7 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:03:15 PM

Posted 04 November 2017 - 11:04 AM

I want to build a new mini iTX system to save some space (this is my primary goal), right now I have a full ATX desktop built around the i5 2500k CPU.  

 

Now seems like a good time, the new i3 processors look pretty good performance (compared to previous generation i3)

 

But do you think a system using the i3-8100 processor would be any faster than my current system?  At the very least I'd want a small amount of performance improvement.   

 

I would consider the i3-8350K but if I can get a reasonable performance from the 8100 I'd rather save the money.

From passmark website I found the following scores

 

i5-2500K    6467

i3-8100      7918

i3-8350K    9603

 

 

Any thoughts?



BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


m

#2 Drillingmachine

Drillingmachine

  • Members
  • 2,083 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:09:15 PM

Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:04 PM

Generally Passmark is poor indication of CPU performance if higher accuracy is needed. It may show big picture but rarely better. For example:

 

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X 15,433
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 14,642

 

Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X is exactly same CPU as Ryzen 7 1700, only difference is name so performance should also be same.

 

Performance improvement is very small and even smaller if you overclock 2500K. I also see no valid reasons to switch 4C/4T CPU into another 4C/4T CPU. Another reason i3-8100 is not very good choice for ITX system is fact that it has no soldered heat spreader and so needs good cooling.

 

For those reasons (and limited upgrade path) I recommend at least Ryzen 5 1600.



#3 jonuk76

jonuk76

  • Members
  • 1,933 posts
  • ONLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wales, UK
  • Local time:07:15 PM

Posted 04 November 2017 - 12:23 PM

Assuming stock speeds, some improvement in performance, but not a massive amount.  The i5-2500K is overclockable, while the i3 8100 isn't.  Here's an alternative comparison - http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-2500K-vs-Intel-Core-i3-8100/619vs3942

 

If you wanted a more definite upgrade without a big cost increase consider the 6 core i5-8400 (along with the R5 1600). It's base clock of 2.8 Ghz is pretty irrelevant - it's a 3.8 Ghz chip.

 

I wouldn't build a system if I didn't need one at the moment. RAM prices are the highest they've been for years (where I am, prices have tripled over the last 2 years), and video card and SSD prices are also not great.  Who knows where they go from here, but in my experience RAM prices in particular are volatile and likely to fall at some point from where they are at the moment..


Edited by jonuk76, 05 November 2017 - 04:30 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users