Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

How can I Set Up an Outlook 2013 Forwarding Rule on a IMAP Folder?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 mikeloeven

mikeloeven

  • Members
  • 156 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:05:57 PM

Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:41 AM

Does anyone know how to set up a mail forwarding rule that will automatically forward any new messages in a set IMAP folder to the target address? The problem is that the messages to be forwarded are initially sorted on the mail server and reside In a IMAP folder however the outlook rules dont seem to have an option to target a specific folder.


Edited by hamluis, 07 March 2017 - 11:01 AM.
Moved from Business Apps to Web Browsing/Email - Hamluis.


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 britechguy

britechguy

    Been there, done that, got the T-shirt


  • Moderator
  • 8,658 posts
  • ONLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Staunton, VA
  • Local time:06:57 PM

Posted 07 March 2017 - 10:25 AM

This is typically done on the server side using the filter that sorts the messages into the specific IMAP folder in the first place.  I know how to do it for Gmail but have no idea precisely how it would be done elsewhere.


Brian  AKA  Bri the Tech Guy (website in my user profile) - Windows 10 Home, 64-Bit, Version 1803, Build 17134 

     . . . the presumption of innocence, while essential in the legal realm, does not mean the elimination of common sense outside it.  The willing suspension of disbelief has its limits, or should.

    ~ Ruth Marcus,  November 10, 2017, in Washington Post article, Bannon is right: It’s no coincidence The Post broke the Moore story


 

 

 

              

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users