Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

E-mail spammer still good for e-mails you don't have acces to?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
3 replies to this topic

#1 Carpentry

Carpentry

  • Members
  • 61 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:10:50 AM

Posted 03 February 2017 - 04:50 PM

I remember reading about these a few years back, but with e-mail servers expanding their capacity. Are these spammers still good?

 

Does anybody know some that still work?



BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 Chris Cosgrove

Chris Cosgrove

  • Moderator
  • 7,016 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland
  • Local time:07:50 PM

Posted 03 February 2017 - 06:41 PM

Are you talking about software to send spam ?

 

Chris Cosgrove



#3 Carpentry

Carpentry
  • Topic Starter

  • Members
  • 61 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:10:50 AM

Posted 04 February 2017 - 04:15 AM

I think so. I found an online site, but it wasn't working from my computer or my friend's.

 

Know of any other online alternatives?



#4 Chris Cosgrove

Chris Cosgrove

  • Moderator
  • 7,016 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland
  • Local time:07:50 PM

Posted 04 February 2017 - 05:00 AM

In most jurisdictions sending spam is either borderline or actually illegal. This topic is now closed.

 

Chris Cosgrove






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users