Hello, I don't understand hardware that much. I only know the basic stuff. Some computers have more RAM but less cpu speed, some of them have less RAM but more CPU speed. Something like that I guess
So in my budget I've chosen 2 computers. They're at the same price. But I couldn't decide which one was better.
ACER E5-553G-T7Q5 :
RAM : 8 GB (DDR4)
CPU : AMD A10 - 2.4GHZ (3.3 Turbo) - 2 MB Cache [A10-9600P}
GPU : 2 GB (AMD)
HDD : 1 TB (SATA)
ACER E5-571G-304Q :
RAM : 4 GB (DDR3)
CPU : INTEL Core i3 - 2.0 GHZ - 3 MB CACHE [5005U]
GPU : 2 GB (NVIDIA)
HDD : 500 GB (SATA)
So the first computer has more RAM, more HDD storage and a faster processor (I'm talking about the GHZ's)
...whereas the second computer has 1 mb more cache in CPU, but it sacrifices like 500 gb's of storage and 4 gb's of RAM. I mean only 1 mb of cache in CPU, is it really expensive that they had to sacrifice 4 GBs of RAM and 500 GBs of disk space?
So, which one would be faster? I'm thinking that the second computer sacrificed all that RAM and HDD storage to put a faster proccessor. So the second computer would run faster, with less storage, right? But on the other hand, the first one has 4 GB's of more RAM - I thought more RAM would mean a faster computer. I'm really confused.
I mean I don't know. I'm not an expert. If you could tell me which one would be the optional one, I'd really appreciate it. Thank you in advance!