The only thing I worry about using something like puppy is the browser version. If the browser is not updated is there a chance it could be compromised? Even though the chances are non-existent on getting an infection how would a USB version of Puppy be compared to a CD version security wise? Does it make a difference? I know you can create a bootable USB with persistence for Puppy.
Just because Puppy runs on old hardware, doesn't mean it uses old software..!
If you run either of the two current 64-bit 'flagship' Pups from a stick (Tahr64 and Slacko64), I produce up-to-date versions of Chrome and SlimJet (based on Chromium) for Puppians, in the SFS 'load-on-the-fly' package format that Puppy uses. These are available through the Murga-Linux Puppy Forums:-
I've been doing my on-line banking in Pup for the last couple of years, clearing the cache & browser history after each visit. I've never had a problem yet. As I stated just yesterday in another post, there will always be the 'paranoid' types for whom nothing will ever be secure enough (and indeed, 100% security is impossible to achieve. The only way to achieve that is not to switch your machine on in the first place!)
Pup-on-a-stick, running up-to-date Chrome or SlimJet, with uBlock Origin and a cache & browser history cleaner (Click'n'Clean) comes pretty close, though.....
And Nick's solution sounds good, too..!
Edited by Mike_Walsh, 02 November 2016 - 11:20 AM.
Distros:- Multiple 'Puppies'..... and Anti-X 16.1
My Puppy BLOG ~~~ My Puppy PACKAGES
Compaq Presario SR1916UK; Athlon64 X2 3800+, 3 GB RAM, WD 500GB Caviar 'Blue', 32GB Kingspec PATA SSD, 3 TB Seagate 'Expansion' external HDD, ATI Radeon Xpress 200 graphics, Dell 15.1" pNp monitor (1024 x 768), TP-Link PCI-e USB 3.0 card, Logitech c920 HD Pro webcam, self-powered 7-port USB 2.0 hub
Dell Inspiron 1100; 2.6 GHz 400FSB P4, 1.5 GB RAM, 64GB KingSpec IDE SSD, Intel 'Extreme' graphics, 1 TB Seagate 'Expansion' external HDD, M$ HD-3000 'Lifecam'.