Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

SD 3.0 transfer of 335Kb/s. Is that normal?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 harryhh

harryhh

  • Members
  • 53 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Princeton, ILL
  • Local time:10:25 AM

Posted 29 September 2016 - 06:23 PM

I have a GPS map on my computer in the form of a 2.3Gb .img file. I read that I can put that directly on a SD card and the GPS can read it.

 

I have a USB cable plugged into the back of my computer 3.0 ports and into my GPS with a 4Gb SD card installed as drive N:. I dragged the .img file to drive N: and the transfer rate is about 335Kb/s. Is that what I should expect?

 

Harry


Can't keep up with the computer stuff anymore. It's getting beyond me.  :mellow:


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 hamluis

hamluis

    Moderator


  • Moderator
  • 55,874 posts
  • ONLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Killeen, TX
  • Local time:10:25 AM

Posted 01 October 2016 - 04:35 PM

FWIW:  General observation that I have made...when transferring files from system-attachedd-drive to small media  (.mp3 player, flash drive), the transfer rate seems to be bottlenecked by the size of the media.  The transfer rate from the media to the system is much faster.

 

Louis






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users