Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Adding RAM and upgrading Hard drive a Zero Sum game?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 allstock

allstock

  • Members
  • 120 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:05:55 PM

Posted 09 April 2016 - 10:17 PM

I was pondering this as I was looking at SSDs. Would it be true that no matter how much RAM and size of your HD, the performance degradation IS a constant as the amount of data stored progressively increases. Ergo, it would always be optimal to be lopsided in the amount of RAM to HD size ratio.

Does this thought have any substance???


Edited by Queen-Evie, 11 April 2016 - 07:58 AM.
moved from System Building and Upgrading to Internal Hardware


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 Drillingmachine

Drillingmachine

  • Members
  • 2,382 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:01:55 AM

Posted 10 April 2016 - 07:09 AM

No. Performance degration is much more complex issue. On SSD, performance is quite constant unless SSD is nearly full. On HDD performance depends on where on disc data is stored.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users