Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Cannot Get Rid Of Acrobat Reader 2.1


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Gswiss

Gswiss

  • Members
  • 37 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:09:31 AM

Posted 14 April 2006 - 12:01 PM

On a pc running under XP Home SP2, Adobe Reader 6 was installed and running occasionally whenever required. Recently, whenever I double-click on a pdf file, Acrobat Reader 2.1 is launched instead and hangs.

Using Windows Explorer, I noticed that no PDF entry exists under Tools - Folder Options - File Types.

I got rid of all Adobe or Acrobat references on the PC (including registry entries) and re-installed Acrobat 6. I still get 2.1 when I try to open a pdf file. Still no pdf reference in File Type list.

After I got rid of all spywares using AdAware and Spybot, I uninstalled Adobe Reader 6 and still get 2.1 opening and hanging at any attempt to open a pdf file.

Any suggestion is welcome.

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


m

#2 Gswiss

Gswiss
  • Topic Starter

  • Members
  • 37 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:09:31 AM

Posted 21 April 2006 - 12:22 PM

I solved the problem. Apparently, nobodywas interested in it. Thanks anyway.

#3 acklan

acklan

    Bleepin' cat's meow


  • Members
  • 8,529 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Baton Rouge, La.
  • Local time:07:31 AM

Posted 21 April 2006 - 02:13 PM

I don't think it was that no one was interested, they just did not know the answer. If you don't mind, what was your solution?
"2007 & 2008 Windows Shell/User Award"

#4 boopme

boopme

    To Insanity and Beyond


  • Global Moderator
  • 72,214 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ USA
  • Local time:08:31 AM

Posted 21 April 2006 - 03:46 PM

Yes, please post back with the solution. You see there were some 30 hits on your post. I looked for an hour and would be interested to know the solution.
How do I get help? Who is helping me?For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear....Become a BleepingComputer fan: Facebook

#5 Animal

Animal

    Bleepin' Animinion


  • Site Admin
  • 34,286 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Where You Least Expect Me To Be
  • Local time:05:31 AM

Posted 23 April 2006 - 01:54 PM

Yes, that is correct it was not a matter of disinterest. It was a matter of I looked for things that had not already been mentioned at having been attempted. I tried for 2 days to find a fix and came up empty.

Lack of a reply is not a sign of disinterest. It is often a matter of we do not have an answer that does not include items you have already tried.

Yes please post your resolution so that others may be able to resolve their own issues as well. Thank You in advance for your resolution post.

Regards, Animal

The Internet is so big, so powerful and pointless that for some people it is a complete substitute for life.
Andrew Brown (1938-1994)


A learning experience is one of those things that say, "You know that thing you just did? Don't do that." Douglas Adams (1952-2001)


"Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination circles the world." Albert Einstein (1879-1955)


Follow BleepingComputer on: Facebook | Twitter | Google+




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users