Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

65nm And 45nm


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 RandomUser

RandomUser

  • Members
  • 518 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:07:05 PM

Posted 23 February 2006 - 12:58 AM

Has anyone read information about the 65nm or 45nm chips yet?

I've heard that Errata in the Mac Books(The Processors), and Eye-Sight is plaguing those systems. Is this something that can be solved in future version of the 65nm chip?


I realize the 45nm chips aren't out yet? But do they stand any chance against an Athlon 64 Built on those technologies?


And one further? Will intel be the first to break the 4 ghz, and then :thumbsup: the 5 ghz, benchmarks respectively?

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 Nick_R_23

Nick_R_23

  • Members
  • 185 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Willow, AK
  • Local time:03:05 PM

Posted 23 February 2006 - 03:25 AM

i wouldnt know much of the 45nm chips, but on the Ghz subject, Intel already broke 4 ghz, but the chip had heating issues and other bugs in general, so they couldn't release the chip for sale. Recently though, it looks like the only major issue holding the chip back is production. http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117176,00.asp -Heres a PCWorld article on the subject.

AMD does theirs a different way, their chips are marked by what the chip can supposedly process at (compared to intel's ratings), which is why the chip is labled (for example) 4000+ , 2.4 ghz. The '4000+' is what it can supposedly process at (4 ghz) (compared to Intel) and the real clock speed (2.4 ghz).

Overall, the Ghz of a processor seems to be less important than it was a few months ago, as heating issues arose with such extreme speeds, the more popular thing now is dual cores. You will probably be more likely to see a tri or quad core processor long before 5 ghz processors appear.

-Nick




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users