Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Single-atom transistor busts the records


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 cryptodan

cryptodan

    Bleepin Madman


  • Members
  • 21,868 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Catonsville, Md
  • Local time:12:53 PM

Posted 20 February 2012 - 03:57 PM

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/12953872/single-atom-transistor-busts-the-records/

"Our group has proved that it is really possible to position one phosphorus atom in a silicon environment, exactly as we need it, with near-atomic precision, and at the same time (incorporate) gates," said lead scientist Martin Fuechsle.



BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 ranget

ranget

  • Members
  • 250 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:07:53 AM

Posted 20 February 2012 - 06:34 PM

IDK what to say


SCI FI coming to Life

A big thanks to Dider Stevens

sorry for not being around

 


#3 Billy O'Neal

Billy O'Neal

    Visual C++ STL Maintainer


  • Malware Response Team
  • 12,304 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Redmond, Washington
  • Local time:05:53 AM

Posted 20 February 2012 - 08:53 PM

Of note: current CPU transistors are actually reasonably near this limit already. Consider Intel's recently announced 22 nanometer process, where an SRAM cell consists of 6 transistors, and is 0.1 micrometers square. Plus, the size of SRAM includes connections between those transistors, so figure maybe 3 atoms per transistor in "wiring" gives a size of an SRAM cell of about 24 atoms. Therefore, assuming the atomic radius of a single silicon atom is ~100 picometers: (sqrt(0.1) micrometers / 24) / 100pm or about 131.761569. A significant gain, to be sure, but not really "enormous" (to give an idea, that would be about 7 "die shrinks" from now, assuming you could mass produce such transistors. The 2000s decade had about 5 die shrinks, to give an idea. Moreover, this ignores that even if you can make a single atom sized transistor, there are still other parts of the chip that would have to be dealt with, which would (presumably) be greater than the size of an atom, and therefore the total size of the entire apparatus doesn't shrink that much.

Is it a step forward? Yes, yes it is. But it's not an unbelievable advancement. I think it's likely we'll see other technologies hitting limits before we see transistors pushed to this kind of size. (e.g. we're already having problems scaling CMOS lithography at the current (22nm) process node; creating transistors one by one with a SEM isn't really practical for something like a CPU, which has (in Ivy Bridge) some 2.27 billion transistors)

The more amazing thing is that *current* transistors are as small as they are and still mass produced.

Edited by Billy O'Neal, 20 February 2012 - 08:54 PM.

Twitter - My statements do not establish the official position of Microsoft Corporation, and are my own personal opinion. (But you already knew that, right?)
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users