I'm a netbook reviewer, and I am actually comparing the Amd Athlon II Neo K125 to the AMD C-50 dual core APU.
I got many opinions from different websites, including Bleepingcomputer, and they all said that the AMD C-50 would be better because of dual-core.
Now I looked at the benchmarks, and surprise, the Neo single core cpu wins with a score of 495 vs 451 for C-50.
Now I want to know... Why?? The AMD Athlon II Neo K125 has 1.7GHZ Single-Core and the AMD C-50 has 1GHZ dual-core.
Freak thing a?
I ask this because I want to explain it in my review.
Thank you very much!
If you guys want my sources, here are both benchmarks:
Edited by alpha4345, 19 July 2011 - 05:00 PM.