Jump to content
Posted 07 January 2006 - 06:46 PM
Posted 07 January 2006 - 09:41 PM
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:33 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:12 AM
Edited by Rimmer, 08 January 2006 - 01:14 AM.
Posted 08 January 2006 - 06:28 AM
Didnt say that.
In particular the comment that the video evidence is complete and utter BS.
Did say that (kind of).
I imagine that much of it is, but certainly not all.
Yes. Also lots of fakes since. Balls of light that reflect rader does not = Alien life. The most intresting point from it all was the blank all news agencies gave it.
Have you seen them?
The sea has volume yet you can drown in a bath.
Look at the sheer volume of evidence.
Posted 08 January 2006 - 11:26 AM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 11:51 AM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 06:20 PM
One may "believe" all sorts of odd notions. However, until at least one sighting passes the rigours of scientific testing and peer review, no one can correctly say UFO's exist "for a fact."
Posted 08 January 2006 - 06:47 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 07:07 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 07:12 PM
Then we have the evidence recorded by Nasa cameras on the space shuttles.
When the shuttles first went up nasa broadcast live feed from the cameras 24 hours a day. The cameras could see the cargo bay doors and space and often the earth in the background. Some clever fellow was recording all the footage. He then noticed something odd in the background (in space) and went back and reviewed the footage. He found many instances of interesting things happening in the background. I have seen one particular incident and it is quite amazing.
The point is, what did Nasa do? They stopped broadcasting an unedited live feed. I wonder why.
Posted 08 January 2006 - 08:09 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 08:17 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 08:21 PM
Posted 08 January 2006 - 09:31 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users