Jump to content
Posted 15 January 2011 - 07:03 PM
Posted 15 January 2011 - 07:20 PM
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cureSpywareBlaster, WinPatrol Plus, ESET Smart Security, Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, NoScript Firefox ext., Norton noscript
Posted 15 January 2011 - 07:23 PM
is that a bird? a plane? nooo it's the flying blueberry!
If I have been helping you and haven't replied in 2 days, feel free to shoot me a PM! Please don't send help request via PM, unless I am already helping you. Use the forums!
Posted 15 January 2011 - 08:17 PM
Not to mention this........
For those that think this sounds familiar: IObit Security 360 had a similar "problem" more or less a year ago, when they bundled a conduit toolbar that couldn't be uninstallled either. A summary from back then can be found here: about.com
Posted 16 January 2011 - 01:35 AM
Edited by Galadriel, 16 January 2011 - 01:37 AM.
Posted 16 January 2011 - 03:34 AM
Posted 16 January 2011 - 03:47 AM
Posted 16 January 2011 - 03:57 AM
Which is which?
I can tell you, that so far, despite running the uninstaller, I have found several hundred traces of these programs on my test system’s Hard Drive. I can assure you, my comfort level with respect to a true uninstall – is nil.
Posted 16 January 2011 - 07:31 AM
While it's true that IObit does provide an uninstaller (which actually works – more on that follows)........ t
Edited by Union_Thug, 16 January 2011 - 07:33 AM.
Posted 16 January 2011 - 09:50 AM
Been a Windows User for many years. I'm having a Linux holiday. Be secure, enjoy your time online.
Posted 17 January 2011 - 12:41 AM
Posted 17 January 2011 - 01:06 AM
IObit Never Force Users to Install Toolbar
BLAH BLA BLAH...ignore it, and go on with IObit installation.,BLAH BLAH BLAHThis is totally mis-leading and wrong BLAH BLAH BURP BELCH go to Safe Mode to restore BLAH BLAH URP SNORT BELCH IObit is a reliable software vendor URP SNORT BLAH BLAH
Edited by Union_Thug, 17 January 2011 - 01:28 AM.
Posted 17 January 2011 - 03:20 AM
Posted 17 January 2011 - 03:42 AM
The article in question here was written by a longtime supporter of your products. I doubt that classifies as "evil competitor". I have no stake in or against you other than the fact that your company has shown time and again that it does not shy away from IP theft as can be clearly seen by just looking at the logs your ASC program produces and comparing them with say, Hijack This. This isn't even considering the MBAM database debacle of last year... in which you all didn't make any friends in the security community and failed to actually address the issue in any sort of satisfactory manner. So no, I won't take your word for it. I will test on my own system as soon as I've had some sleep (it's almost 3AM here as I write this) and make up my own mind. I do have to say that Mr. Mullins piece was quite damning.
We find some malicious articles, may from our evil competitors,
Posted 17 January 2011 - 05:27 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users