Jump to content
Posted 20 October 2010 - 08:27 AM
Posted 08 November 2010 - 07:32 PM
Posted 09 November 2010 - 12:13 PM
Posted 16 November 2010 - 09:40 AM
Posted 17 November 2010 - 01:47 AM
The speed of the DSL (granted its not a 128kbps/68kbps) has nothing to do with the lag of XBL. Anything better or equal to the lowest DSL (by ATT) 768kbps/128kbps will perform fine. What matters in gaming is the ping. Although DSL normally has a pretty good ping, it varies by location.
In this case, AT&T is your service provider and you have DSL... which isn't very fast :_(
I'm assuming that AT&T's 3.0 DSL is 3mbps <---SLOW
3mbps is great for pretty much everything but gaming and it really wouldn't be that bad for gaming if there weren't people playing Halo with speeds that are faster than yours.
Posted 18 November 2010 - 09:38 AM
Posted 18 November 2010 - 08:25 PM
Not true at all. It's not that uncommon for a cheap DSL connection to have ~25-30ms pings. Were cable from the same area is around 40-50ms.
Is it not true that your ping will be lower if your connection is faster?
Certainly the ping will be very high if you are in Alaska trying to connect to a host in England but would a faster connection not improve the ping between client and host?
Posted 25 March 2011 - 01:54 PM
Posted 25 March 2011 - 02:25 PM
Posted 25 March 2011 - 02:42 PM
Not true at all. It's not that uncommon for a cheap DSL connection to have ~25-30ms pings. Were cable from the same area is around 40-50ms
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users