Jump to content


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.

Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.


ATI and Nvidia Video Cards

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Stargazer25


  • Members
  • 5 posts
  • Local time:04:36 PM

Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:56 PM

I am having a hard time with choosing a video card. Nvidia seems like the best choice for overall gaming and even 2D graphics but I'm not sure how to make sense of the dicussions in some areas even though I know and understand most of the overall issues being addressed. I heard from some reviews ATI Radeon 5850, 5870, etc is good and excellent but on some I heard that Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 has a better overall performance. Is the ATI chip worth it or is the Nvidia chip the overall best considering the 5xxx series of ATI chips might have problems in some areas as other websites and reviews suggested?

Edited by Stargazer25, 26 July 2010 - 09:04 PM.

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)


#2 RainbowSix


  • Members
  • 604 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:05:36 PM

Posted 26 July 2010 - 09:23 PM

The Radeon HD 5850 and 5870 cards are overall better than the GTX 285. The problem is when you have crossfire or SLI with high-end cards. The CPU becomes a bottleneck and can make it appear as though less powerful cards have better performance.

Edited by RainbowSix, 26 July 2010 - 09:26 PM.

[ Antec 1200 v3 | Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 rev. 3.1 | AMD Phenom II x6 1090T (overclocked to 4GHz) | Corsair XMS3 4x4GB DDR3 1600 | COOLER MASTER Silent Pro 600W & Visiontek Juice Box 450W | SAMSUNG 470 Series 64GB SSD | WD Caviar Black 640GB & Samsung Spinpoint 2TB HDD | 2x XFX Radeon HD 5770 in Crossfire | SAMSUNG 22X DVD±RW | Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit]

CompTIA A+ certified
Stringfellow Electronics

#3 the_patriot11


    High Tech Redneck

  • BC Advisor
  • 6,763 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wyoming USA
  • Local time:03:36 PM

Posted 29 July 2010 - 05:32 PM

A lot of it is personal preference, they both make good cards. I tend to always use ATI-in everything from run of the mill computers to high end gaming rigs-I find them to have good graphics and performance for less. In my experience from comparing similar ATI/NVIDIA cards, ATI cards typically have slightly better graphics, while NVIDIA normally has slightly better framerate, however this isnt true of all the cards, its just a general comparison, and neither is extravagently more then the rest.



Primary system: Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3, Processor: AMD Phenom II x4 945, Memory: 16 gigs of Patriot G2 DDR3 1600, Video: AMD Sapphire Nitro R9 380, Storage: 1 WD 500 gig HD, 1 Hitachi 500 gig HD, and Power supply: Coolermaster 750 watt, OS: Windows 10 64 bit. 

Media Center: Motherboard: Gigabyte mp61p-S3, Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+, Memory: 6 gigs Patriot DDR2 800, Video: Gigabyte GeForce GT730, Storage: 500 gig Hitachi, PSU: Seasonic M1211 620W full modular, OS: Windows 10.

If I don't reply within 24 hours of your reply, feel free to send me a pm.

#4 JonM33


  • Banned
  • 503 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:05:36 PM

Posted 04 August 2010 - 07:49 PM

To piggyback on what patriot09 is saying, it has been accepted that ATi's graphics cards have the best IQ (image quality). Typically nVIDIA graphics cards used to offer higher framerate by tricking the drivers to use lower IQ for the sake of better performance.

These days though, the performance crown jumps back and forth. ATi released the Radeon HD 5800 series in September 2009 and had the performance crown for over 6 months. nVIDIA had nothing to compete and was outperformed by a mile during that time. Eventually the GTX 480 came out and nVIDIA took the performance crown back - at the cost of a hotter running and more power hungry solution. nVIDIA graphics cards are also generally more expensive, as ATi always tends to drop the prices of their graphics cards to keep the competitive edge.

Also, ATi actually has a higher market share than nVIDIA.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users