Jump to content
Posted 12 May 2010 - 04:19 PM
Posted 12 May 2010 - 04:59 PM
Primary system: Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3, Processor: AMD Phenom II x4 945, Memory: 16 gigs of Patriot G2 DDR3 1600, Video: AMD Sapphire Nitro R9 380, Storage: 1 WD 500 gig HD, 1 Hitachi 500 gig HD, and Power supply: Coolermaster 750 watt, OS: Windows 10 64 bit.
Media Center: Motherboard: Gigabyte mp61p-S3, Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+, Memory: 6 gigs Patriot DDR2 800, Video: Gigabyte GeForce GT730, Storage: 500 gig Hitachi, PSU: Seasonic M1211 620W full modular, OS: Windows 10.
If I don't reply within 24 hours of your reply, feel free to send me a pm.
Posted 12 May 2010 - 08:44 PM
And this time around, the way the USB spec is written, says Jeff Ravencraft, consumers should have an easier time finding products that are truly USB 3.0. Before, in the transition from USB 1.1 to USB 2.0, the USB 2.0 spec was written in a way where it "encompassed low, full and high-speed USB," explains Ravencraft, president and chairman of the USB Implementers Forum. "Since those are all encapsulated in the USB 2.0 spec, [vendors] could have a certified product that's low-speed, but still call it USB 2.0.
"We don't have that issue with USB 3.0 To claim you're USB 3.0, you have to deliver 5Gbps. There's no other way to get the certification."
Ravencraft adds that the group is prepared to protect the USB 3.0 logo, to make sure that only manufacturers who go through certification use it. "We'll take legal action if anyone infringes on our marks."
It's more power efficient.
It's backwards compatible.
Edited by ReviverSoft, 12 May 2010 - 08:48 PM.
Posted 12 May 2010 - 08:47 PM
Edited by computerxpds, 12 May 2010 - 08:49 PM.
Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:47 PM
Edited by Ryan 3000, 15 May 2010 - 08:47 PM.
Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:53 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users