Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Senate approves Spyware bill!


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Grinler

Grinler

    Lawrence Abrams


  • Admin
  • 43,639 posts
  • ONLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Local time:08:39 AM

Posted 24 September 2004 - 10:03 AM

On Wednesday the United States Senate has unanimously approved the SPY BLOCK Act which prohibits the installation of software on computers without the end users knowledge. The SPY BLOCK SPY BLOCK Act would prohibit software developers from using misleading information as a means to cause end users to install their software, to create software that is difficult to remove, and stop the installation of software that collects and transmits the users activities without the user's permission. Though this is great news and will definitely put a damper on a spyware company operating in the US, we will still have a problem with spyware developers outside the US. This is definitely, though, a big step forward.


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 tg1911

tg1911

    Lord Spam Magnet


  • Members
  • 19,274 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SW Louisiana
  • Local time:06:39 AM

Posted 24 September 2004 - 11:12 AM

Like you said, Grinler, a good start.
MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P, CPU: Phenom II X4 955 Deneb BE, HS/F: CoolerMaster V8, RAM: 2 x 1G Kingston HyperX DDR2 800, VGA: ECS GeForce Black GTX 560, PSU: Antec TruePower Modular 750W, Soundcard: Asus Xonar D1, Case: CoolerMaster COSMOS 1000, Storage: Internal - 2 x Seagate 250GB SATA, 2 x WD 1TB SATA; External - Seagate 500GB USB, WD 640GB eSATA, 3 x WD 1TB eSATA

Become a BleepingComputer fan: Facebook

#3 KoanYorel

KoanYorel

    Bleepin' Conundrum


  • Members
  • 19,461 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:65 miles due East of the "Logic Free Zone", in Md, USA
  • Local time:08:39 AM

Posted 24 September 2004 - 12:04 PM

I'm not sure if this is a good start...

I would rather have seen the WWW take care of this problem in and by itself. (They/we still can if it's worked on vigorously.)

The old adage "give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile" applies here.

When & if SPY BLOCK becomes law, who's going to investigate and enforce the law(s)?

FCC, FBI, CIA, NSA, Home Land Security... or all of them...

Or will we have a new agency - say, the "Web Wacky Wranglers of the World Wide Web". (And we'll pay for it with a penny a click?)

Then how long will it be until the United Nations wants a piece of the action (and have the USA pay for it of course).

I'm curious as to when was the last time anyone reading this thread personally chastised a local business for spamming, or e-mailed a company that they might due business with for advertising with spammers? (I've only managed to clang on a couple in the last year.)

Just a few "odd" thoughts to consider.

~Koan
The only easy day was yesterday.

...some do, some don't; some will, some won't (WR)

#4 cowsgonemadd3

cowsgonemadd3

    Feed me some spyware!


  • Banned
  • 4,557 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:08:39 AM

Posted 24 September 2004 - 12:08 PM

Thats great! The future looks better for our pcs!

#5 TedOb1

TedOb1

  • Members
  • 31 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:08:39 AM

Posted 28 September 2004 - 04:22 PM

KoanYorel while agree with you that the web should be self regulating I also don’t think its possible anymore for individual action to have an affect on this problem. there's just to much money involved plus the amount of people that take action (I take action) is too insignificant. Its about the same percentage as those that take their privacy seriously. Usually its ‘well I have nothing to hide’. most people that use the internet dont even know what were talking about when spyware is mentioned.

I really don’t believe a bill like this will do much to stop spyware. All that need be done is to hide a statement or a link to a statement somewhere on the web site and their covered as far as the bill goes and with so many getting infected from porn and warez sites that victims could never turn in…besides, cleaning it keeps us off the street and sometimes pays for food.

When you consider that spyware/adware distributors take advantage of security flaws to access your system they should be treated the same way script kiddies or professional black hats are. They are going into our computers to ‘steal’ information and they’re accessing systems in a way that’s not intended thereby bypassing authentication mechanisms…I think that fits the discription for a break-in under the current computer crime laws. A bill like the one that just passed IMO is just there so politicians can say they are behind it.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users