Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Raid questions


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 hispaladin

hispaladin

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middle of a corn field
  • Local time:01:49 AM

Posted 12 May 2009 - 02:26 PM

I'm looking at bidding a new server to a company, they currently have a raid 5 setup and are having lots of trouble with it (hardware problems not really raid problems) now i have to explain why to use raid 6 as opposed to 5, and I'm honestly just not sure what the difference is myself. any explanations on what is different would be helpful.

Thanks

Edited by hispaladin, 12 May 2009 - 02:27 PM.


BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 fairjoeblue

fairjoeblue

  • Members
  • 1,594 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Local time:01:49 AM

Posted 12 May 2009 - 02:51 PM

Read,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels
OCZ StealthXstream 700W,Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R , E8500, Arctic Freezer Pro 7, 3GB G.Skill PC8500,Gigabyte Radeon HD 4850 OC [1GB ], Seagate 250GB SATA II X2 in RAID 0, Samsung SATA DVD burner.

#3 hispaladin

hispaladin
  • Topic Starter

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middle of a corn field
  • Local time:01:49 AM

Posted 12 May 2009 - 09:39 PM

Thanks Fairjoeblue,
I am still wandering (if this was covered in the article i must have missed it) if i run a raid 6 with 4 drives what bonus will i get over a raid 5 with 4 drives? I see that the raid 6 can have 5 drives which will allow 2 drive failures at the same time without problems but i don't see how a raid 6 with only 4 drives will be better than 5 with 4?
(if this is covered in the article you gave me please tell me and i will reread again)

Thanks

#4 Dev Mgr

Dev Mgr

  • Members
  • 24 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:01:49 AM

Posted 14 May 2009 - 01:24 PM

Raid basics:

When a drive (in a redundant raid setup) has a bad sector, it tries to reread it, if it can't, it checks if the drive has it in it's cache (most drives have 16 or 32MB onboard), if it's not there, the raid controller checks if it's in raid cache. If it's not there either, it recreates the data in the bad sector using the raid redundancy.

The bigger the drive, the more sectors there are and the higher the chance of running into a bad sector.

When a raid 5 has a failed drive and is either rebuilding to a hotspare or is awaiting you to replace the failed drive and during this time it runs into a bad sector, it cannot recreate the data. If your computer had relevant data in that sector, you could have some dataloss or data corruption. There is also a chance that a 2nd drive fails during this window as most people would use drives that are about the same age and same model, so when a drive fails (other than the first 90 day or so window), it's not impossible that another drive is close to failing as well.

With a raid 6 there are 2 parity calculations and if 1 drive has failed you still have a 2nd parity to recreate missing data. You can also lose 2 drives before you're in a degraded (non-redundant) state.

The downside to raid 6 is the performance degradation as 2 parity calculations need to be done by the raid controller.

I'd recommend raid 6 for larger SATA raid setups. With just 4 drives you may want to consider just going raid 10 for more performance and each drive has a full mirror to another drive (the most redundant option of standard raid types).

#5 hispaladin

hispaladin
  • Topic Starter

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middle of a corn field
  • Local time:01:49 AM

Posted 14 May 2009 - 05:16 PM

Thank you for that explanation. Though the only options i have for the server i am looking at is raid 5 or 6. Since performance is not a major issue for us raid 6 seems to be the better option.
Thanks again




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users