Jump to content
Posted 27 April 2009 - 10:51 AM
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
Malware analyst @ Emsisoft
Posted 27 April 2009 - 11:59 AM
Posted 27 April 2009 - 01:29 PM
Posted 27 April 2009 - 08:52 PM
Posted 28 April 2009 - 04:59 AM
I'm a bit confused. In the information about how tests are conducted link, AV-Comparatives states "Tests influenced by money /AssociateID Referals...[include] TopTenReviews...[TopTenReviews] stitches up a web site with more or less junk info...Additionally the tables contain wrong and outdated information." Isn't it an untrustworthy site?
Independent comparatives of Anti-virus Software
click on the "Comparatives" link on the left
TopTen Review: AntiVirus Software Product Comparisons
These types of comparative testing results will vary depending on who is doing the testing, what they are testing for, what versions of anti-virus software is being tested, etc. There are no universally predefined set of standards/criteria for testing and each test will yield different results. Thus, you need to look for detailed information about how the tests were conducted, the procedures used, and data results. Read Anti-virus Testing Websites: An overview of testing sites
I completely agree.
Choosing an anti-virus is a matter of personal preference...There is no universal "one size fits all" solution that works for everyone.
Posted 08 May 2009 - 03:45 PM
Posted 08 May 2009 - 03:49 PM
Avast is really great because it has a re-boot scan for boot sector viruses and you can get it free.
Posted 08 May 2009 - 04:32 PM
No its not but so that no one reading that statement gets the wrong impression...
Having just one AV Scanner just isn't enough anymore.
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
Edited by koolkat, 10 May 2009 - 08:20 PM.
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:40 PM
Oh an AVG is total garbage.
Posted 10 May 2009 - 08:22 PM
Hey if that piece garbage works for you then "Here,Here".
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users