Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Installing symantec 2005 and adobe 7.0


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Robrooklyn

Robrooklyn

  • Members
  • 16 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:11:43 PM

Posted 17 June 2005 - 04:28 PM

I'm trying to intall and I get a The product requires Windows 2000 service pack 1 or higher to intall for the symantec and for the 7.0 I get the Application cannot be installed on this operating system. I'd like to get the adobe especially since I have Norton systems work but I don't know if I can do that with Windows ME. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 Joshuacat

Joshuacat

    01001010 01000011


  • Members
  • 1,950 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada
  • Local time:12:43 AM

Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:08 PM

Here are the system requirements for Adobe 7.0 Reader:

Adobe Reader 7.0 system requirements
Windows

    * Intel® Pentium® processor
    * Microsoft® Windows 2000 with Service Pack 2, Windows XP Professional or Home Edition, or Windows XP Tablet PC Edition
    * 128MB of RAM
    * Up to 90MB of available hard-disk space
    * Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher


You will have to download Adobe 6.x instead.

And for Norton System Works -
Look here.

I am not really a big fan of System works. I had it loaded on my system at one time, and it seemed to use up a lot of system resources.
JC




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users