Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Which monitor is the best out of these 3


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 GrandslammerBD

GrandslammerBD

  • Members
  • 28 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:12:59 AM

Posted 10 April 2009 - 11:25 AM

I have 3 monitors in mind that I am considering purchasing. They are all around the 50 - 100 dollar price range which fits my budget. I just dont know which would be the best monitor for the price. They all seem to have the same max resolution. The only difference I noticed was the contrast ratio. They response time was also the same. Help my decipher which monitor is the best. THANX!

HERE THEY ARE:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Se...&CatId=1410

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Se...&CatId=1410

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Se...&CatId=1410

I have a feeling he Westinghouse montor I found would be the best because it has a lower DPI than the other monitors

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 the_patriot11

the_patriot11

    High Tech Redneck


  • BC Advisor
  • 6,763 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wyoming USA
  • Local time:11:59 PM

Posted 10 April 2009 - 11:46 PM

I think, between the 3, the second option would be my pick, better the contrast ratio would be good. question, have you tried newegg yet?

picard5.jpg

 

Primary system: Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3, Processor: AMD Phenom II x4 945, Memory: 16 gigs of Patriot G2 DDR3 1600, Video: AMD Sapphire Nitro R9 380, Storage: 1 WD 500 gig HD, 1 Hitachi 500 gig HD, and Power supply: Coolermaster 750 watt, OS: Windows 10 64 bit. 

Media Center: Motherboard: Gigabyte mp61p-S3, Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+, Memory: 6 gigs Patriot DDR2 800, Video: Gigabyte GeForce GT730, Storage: 500 gig Hitachi, PSU: Seasonic M1211 620W full modular, OS: Windows 10.

If I don't reply within 24 hours of your reply, feel free to send me a pm.


#3 Platypus

Platypus

  • Moderator
  • 14,497 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia
  • Local time:03:59 PM

Posted 11 April 2009 - 03:53 AM

The main difference there is what will suit you better, the 4:3 aspect ratio or 16:10 widescreen.

Top 5 things that never get done:

1.


#4 Elise

Elise

    Bleepin' Blonde


  • Malware Study Hall Admin
  • 61,115 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Romania
  • Local time:08:59 AM

Posted 11 April 2009 - 05:00 AM

I personally would go for the second, mostly due to the contrast rate, second best the first, and last the third.

regards, Elise


"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."

 

Follow BleepingComputer on: Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | lockerdome

 

Malware analyst @ Emsisoft





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users