Jump to content


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.

Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.


Dell Dimension

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 flyeguy


  • Members
  • 39 posts
  • Local time:10:26 PM

Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:35 PM

i have a Dell Dimension E310 which came with an Intel® 82915G/82910GL Express Chipset Family installed.this comp is about 4 years old now.
a couple of years ago i bought a Raedon X1300/X1550 Series card & installed that thinking that this would be an upgrade & be a better gaming experiance.
let me add,i'm not a hard core gamer,just stuff like Flight Simulator X etc.i'm 61,i'm just an old fart!
i was given the game Oblivion for Xmas,havent installed it yet,& was wondering especially after surfing around & seeing all the absolutely withering & savage reviews of the Raedon card,should i revert back to the Intel,or continue with the Raedon.
also what setting is best,the 32 bit or the 16 bit colors?i've set my screen resolution to 1152x864.is this ok,or should i go higher/lower?
i regulary go to the ATI site & download driver updates for the card,was just trying to see the best fit.
this site has always been extremely helpful to me,look forward to your reply..

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)


#2 Sterling14


  • Members
  • 1,842 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York
  • Local time:10:26 PM

Posted 03 February 2009 - 07:06 PM

In no way are the Integrated Intel graphics better than the ATI card.

32 bit colors is better, and the screen resolution is up to you. A higher screen solution will give you a sharper image, but it will make things smaller. It will also put more work onto your graphics card, so lowering your resolution may be better if you experience lag while gaming. Also, your screen has a max resolution it can support.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." - Thomas Watson, Chairman of IBM, 1943

#3 the_patriot11


    High Tech Redneck

  • BC Advisor
  • 6,763 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wyoming USA
  • Local time:09:26 PM

Posted 04 February 2009 - 12:51 AM

I have always used ATI in the past, and I am a gamer, and I have loved my ati graphics cards. I am still using them. Theres noway at all that an intel integrated card can beat any comparable ATI or nvidia dedicated graphics card. If you like the resolution, and the card handles the games fine theres no need to upgrade or change anything in my opinion, if your not happy then you can play with the options-fewer colors and smaller resolutions will result in better performance, but more colors and higher resolution will look better but may kill your framerate in newer games.



Primary system: Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3, Processor: AMD Phenom II x4 945, Memory: 16 gigs of Patriot G2 DDR3 1600, Video: AMD Sapphire Nitro R9 380, Storage: 1 WD 500 gig HD, 1 Hitachi 500 gig HD, and Power supply: Coolermaster 750 watt, OS: Windows 10 64 bit. 

Media Center: Motherboard: Gigabyte mp61p-S3, Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+, Memory: 6 gigs Patriot DDR2 800, Video: Gigabyte GeForce GT730, Storage: 500 gig Hitachi, PSU: Seasonic M1211 620W full modular, OS: Windows 10.

If I don't reply within 24 hours of your reply, feel free to send me a pm.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users