Jump to content
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:53 PM
Posted 28 January 2009 - 06:21 PM
Edited by hamluis, 28 January 2009 - 08:23 PM.
Posted 28 January 2009 - 07:43 PM
Edited by Sneakycyber, 28 January 2009 - 07:44 PM.
Systems and Network Engineer
Certified CompTia Network +, A +
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:45 AM
Family and loved ones will always be a priority in my daily life. You never know when one will leave you.
Posted 29 January 2009 - 03:37 PM
My guess would be that moving is faster...but it's probably the same.
Data must be read, copied and written in either procedure, I would not expect either to be "faster" than the other. From what I've seen, moving is really copying in some instances.
From what I read...it really depends on from where...to where.
That's my best non-answer , but take a look at the following:
Maybe someone else can give you a better answer.
Edit: I meant to say this earlier. Directly connecting the drive to the motherboard will result in faster transfers than if you use network channels or USB...that much I know from my own trials with moving large files from drive to drive. Important when you have as large a quantity as you stated.
You could use an application like True Image by Acronis or Ghost by Symantec.
Posted 30 January 2009 - 09:17 AM
Edited by Konstantin, 30 January 2009 - 09:17 AM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users