Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Unbiased opinions: Norton 2009?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Mike T

Mike T

  • Members
  • 57 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gateway to the West
  • Local time:02:26 AM

Posted 27 January 2009 - 10:35 AM

I know NAV/NIS has had a bad reputation in the past, but am curious if the 2009 version is better?

In the past, I ran NIS - up through their 2006 version. It started out ok back in 2000, but was bloated beyond belief by the time I ditched it in 2006 - a real system hog. Since then I've ran McAfee for a year and Trend Micro for 2 years.

A month or so ago, MaximumPC had a comparison article on AV app's. They commented NIS had been re-vamped and was no longer a resource hog. They also gave it the best score for catching viruses/malware. Abeit they only compared it against 5 or 6 other applications.

My Trend subsription ran out, so I purchased a 3-license copy of of NIS 2009. I have installed 1 copy on my daughters computer (she is visually impaired and usually doesn't find her way to too many "unsafe" sites). So far I can state it doesn't take up much memory - Task Manager indicates 2 instances of ccSvcHst.exe present totaling around 8 Mb. It also located 3 suspicious files in the Java cache that Trend and 3 other online scanners (BitDefender, F-Secure & Kaspersky) missed. Thought that was a good thing in its favor.

I just reformatted the HDD's on my main machine, and am in the process of reinstalling XP, updating drivers, etc. I haven't installed NIS yet on the other 2 machines, and was curious if anyone with first hand knowledge/use can provide an unbiased comparision of 2009 Norton/Symantec products, and on whether I screwed up buying it? Thanks!

Mike T

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 Bartster

Bartster

  • Members
  • 188 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:03:26 AM

Posted 27 January 2009 - 02:59 PM

Mike T
I have NIS 2009 and have also had the 2007 and 2008 versions. I have found 2009 to be a tremendous improvement over the
previous ones. As an experiment I uninstalled NIS 2009 and tried some of the free ones and I couldn't see any difference in the
performance of my machine. To the question of whether you screwed up, I don't think so. I think it's worth the $5 or so a month.
Besides, you already paid for it, but I don't think you will be disappointed.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users