Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Hard Drive Speeds


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 hamluis

hamluis

    Moderator


  • Moderator
  • 56,435 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Killeen, TX
  • Local time:11:51 PM

Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:08 AM

Recently, there was an assertion erroneously made by myself...regarding transfer speeds of external hard drives compared to drives directly attached to the motherboard or to a PCI controller card.

Appreciate any inputs which clear my cobwebs.

I stated that data transfers using an external hard drive (either PATA or SATA) would be slower than such transfers done with the drive connected internal to the computer case. Although I really had in mind something else (data transfers between systems on a home network), my error has prompted me to do a little more reading.

Result? I now think that I was correct, if erroneous in my thinking :thumbsup:...I don't see how a USB bus allows for faster processing of data from a hard drive that is either PATA or SATA...than a PATA/SATA hard drive connected to the system bus.

I don't know enough about eSATA to include it in my analysis, but I encourage inputs about eSATA as well as my focus on internal vs external.

The logic problem that I have is...an external drive is ultimately going to be limited, not by the USB bus, but by the native abilities of the drive in the enclosure. At least, that's what I think.

Which means that a SATA drive will always be faster than a PATA drive...and a SATA II drive will always be faster than a SATA drive...and eSATA seems to be faster than both.

All comments appreciated, thanks :flowers:. Technical jargon is acceptable :trumpet:.

I found a hard drive chart that may be of interest to some: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/hard-di...rmance,658.html

Louis

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 


#2 dc3

dc3

    Bleeping Treehugger


  • Members
  • 30,757 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sierra Foothills of Northern Ca.
  • Local time:09:51 PM

Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:56 AM

Actually, you are right, but the reason is that the USB controller regulates the speed, and is much slower. The bus speed of a USB 2.0 is 480Mbps, but the controller will be much slower. :thumbsup:

Family and loved ones will always be a priority in my daily life.  You never know when one will leave you.

 

 

 

 


#3 garmanma

garmanma

    Computer Masochist


  • Members
  • 27,809 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cleveland, Ohio
  • Local time:01:51 AM

Posted 08 July 2008 - 07:28 PM

I agree with your assumptions. I once had a page saved about various transfer rates. Trying to read it made my brain freeze. Can't seem tp locate it
Here's one:
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/

Edited by garmanma, 08 July 2008 - 07:32 PM.

Mark
Posted Image
why won't my laptop work?

Having grandkids is God's way of giving you a 2nd chance because you were too busy working your butt off the 1st time around
Do not send me PMs with problems that should be posted in the forums. Keep it in the forums, so everyone benefits
Become a BleepingComputer fan: Facebook and Twitter




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users