Therefore, evolution is fact.
What type of logical fallacy, is this example?
I am thinking it would be an "Undistributed Middle" syllogism. Although, Monkeys( A ) and Humans( B ) share the same property(banana), the difference is that humans are apes, not monkeys. In this case, the conclusion of "evolution [being] fact", would be false.
Am I right, wrong, or are you just as bored as I am for even reading this topic?
On Edit: I just realized I misspelled the title of this topic.
(Moderator edit:corrected spelling. jgweed)
Edited by rsd79, 26 May 2008 - 03:09 PM.