Jump to content


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.

Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.



  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 pimpologist


  • Members
  • 20 posts
  • Local time:04:57 AM

Posted 25 December 2007 - 11:21 PM

Intel Socket 478 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 Processor......good / bad?.....any yays or nays will do :thumbsup:

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)


#2 Platypus


  • Global Moderator
  • 15,516 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia
  • Local time:08:57 PM

Posted 26 December 2007 - 03:01 AM

Well it's not a bad CPU, provided you compare it with other previous-generation CPUs. If it's a Prescott with 1M cache the performance will be higher than a Northwood with 512K.

It depends what you plan to use it for.
Top 5 things that never get done:


#3 rigacci



  • Members
  • 2,604 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Local time:05:57 AM

Posted 26 December 2007 - 07:06 AM

I'm using a 3.0GHZ Prescott in my Asus board with 3GB of RAM and it is great.


#4 hamluis



  • Moderator
  • 56,435 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Killeen, TX
  • Local time:03:57 AM

Posted 26 December 2007 - 07:26 AM

It'a all relative to...what a user desires, what he/she plans to use the processor/system for, and what one is used to.

For me, a non-gamer who only does mundane things on my two desktops, that processor would be more than fine.

The most arduous task I ask of my systems is video rendering and systems since 900-mhz have been capable of doing that.

Gaming flies by different rules, constant updating (by both game-makers and gamers) seems to be the rule-of-thumb.

And...unless you are using a 64-bit O/S, I don't think that 3GB of RAM will produce results dissimilar from 2GB.


Edited by hamluis, 26 December 2007 - 07:27 AM.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users