Jump to content


 


Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.


Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Photo

Python And Perl Portability


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 AMAMH

AMAMH

  • Members
  • 14 posts
  • OFFLINE
  •  
  • Local time:11:53 PM

Posted 27 July 2007 - 03:31 PM

When I make an EXE file from a Python script I notice that it gathers required library files and compress them into one file so the program can run

for Perl I use ,included in the Perl Development kit, PerlApp but I notice that there are no library files , only the main EXE file.
does it put the library files into the EXE file?

and if it does , why do we care about the standard library
I hear that Python is more portable because its standard library is bigger
why is it important to have a bigger standard library while we just include all the required library with the EXE file. :thumbsup:

BC AdBot (Login to Remove)

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users