BleepingComputer.com: Tests Show Vista Is A 'step Back' From Xp

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tests Show Vista Is A 'step Back' From Xp

#1 User is offline   quietman7 

  • Bleepin' Janitor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Posts: 25,518
  • Joined: 09-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia, USA

Posted 27 February 2007 - 11:58 AM

Quote

Researcher likens Vista to Windows 98...Windows Vista's Aero user interface suffers from more "friction" than its predecessor XP, according to a French analyst, and is actually a step back for Microsoft...Windows XP was a major step forward from Windows 98, but Vista is back to where 98 was,"...Microsoft declined to comment on Pfeiffer's Vista user interface research.
pcadvisor.co.uk
Microsoft MVP - Consumer Security 2007-2012 Posted Image
Member of UNITE, Unified Network of Instructors and Trusted Eliminators

#2 Guest_uhaligani_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 27 February 2007 - 12:41 PM

I am a total Vista user, and previously a beta tester. I agee with that comment. The so-called" new hidden features remain, for me, an average, non-game player, user, just that - hidden!

#3 User is offline   usasma 

  • Still visually handicapped, new avatar (a camel) :0)
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16,690
  • Joined: 02-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southeastern CT, USA

Posted 28 February 2007 - 08:02 AM

I have seen a lot of improvements in Vista over XP - but I'll have to say that Aero is just a toy that consumes a lot of resources for very little result of substance.

I've primarily used Ultimate with Aero turned off - but I've come to love the Basic version that came on the laptop that we bought for my wife's office. It's lean and clean and does what I want/need it to do.

Most of the improvements (particularly in the kernel, networking, error handling, and in the error reporting) are significant - although they may not be easily seen by users.

This being said, Vista does use more resources than previous versions of Windows. As with any OS, as it gets more "user friendly" it'll consume more resources. It's gotta get more complicated inside so it'll be easier to use on the outside.

Some will live with it, some won't. Only time will tell if it's a success or not.
- John
**If you need a more detailed explanation, please ask for it. I have the Knack. **

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users