Welcome Guest ( Log In | Click here to Register a free account now! )
Welcome to Bleeping Computer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.| Important Announcement: The winners of the BC Million Post contest have been announced. You can read who the winners are at this post. - BleepingComputer Management |
![]() ![]() |
Jan 31 2007, 07:09 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
New Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 31-January 07 Member No.: 109,327 |
This post has been edited by legalaliens5: Jan 31 2007, 07:29 PM |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2007, 08:20 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() aut viam inveniam aut faciam ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,510 Joined: 14-November 06 From: Ossendrecht/The Netherlands Member No.: 95,557 |
MsMpEng,exe giving particular problems in cojunction with Office updates and Live Care. Which version of WD do you use?Is there any difference between the two pc's in terms configuration?
-------------------- ![]() Free antivirus : AVG Free Free Anti-spyware AVG Anti Spyware Free Firewall :Zone Alarm Ccleaner Ad aware & Manual SpybotS&D&Manual Free Handy programs |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2007, 12:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
New Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 31-January 07 Member No.: 109,327 |
On the system that uses 15,548K, I was using the latest version available of WD.
On the other system, I'm not really sure (not home now). I thought having "windows live update" enabled would keep WD up to date. Is this not true? Anyway, the difference in configurations: Both have 1MB of RAM Both are running XP Media Center One has an Athlon 64 CPU, the other has an Athlon 64 X2 CPU. |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2007, 08:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() aut viam inveniam aut faciam ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,510 Joined: 14-November 06 From: Ossendrecht/The Netherlands Member No.: 95,557 |
On the system that uses 15,548K, I was using the latest version available of WD. Which of the two is giving you problems?
On the other system, I'm not really sure (not home now). I thought having "windows live update" enabled would keep WD up to date. Is this not true? Anyway, the difference in configurations: Both have 1MB of RAM Both are running XP Media Center One has an Athlon 64 CPU, the other has an Athlon 64 X2 CPU. -------------------- ![]() Free antivirus : AVG Free Free Anti-spyware AVG Anti Spyware Free Firewall :Zone Alarm Ccleaner Ad aware & Manual SpybotS&D&Manual Free Handy programs |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2007, 10:22 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Bleepin' Janitor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Global Moderator Posts: 13,431 Joined: 9-July 05 From: Virginia, USA Member No.: 26,513 |
Memory usage will vary. This is normal. MsMpEng.exe uses 8,044K on my system. The usage will increase when Defender is performing a scan. OneCare will automatically scan the file as well because it is an "on access" background scanner.
If your computer performance is not significantly hampered by high CPU usage, then don't worry about the differences in memory usage. -------------------- "THE BAD GUYS DON'T NEED A SEARCH WARRANT. ARE YOU PROTECTED?"
Microsoft MVP - Windows Security 2007-2008 ![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2007, 10:27 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
New Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 31-January 07 Member No.: 109,327 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2008 - 08:35 PM |