Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help Forums Windows Startup Programs Database Spyware and Malware Removal Guides Computer Tutorials Uninstall Database File Database Computer Glossary Computer Resources
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Click here to Register a free account now! )



Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to Bleeping Computer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.
Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.


Important Announcement: We have two terrific contests running on the site that I wanted all our members and guests to know about.

The first contest is the HP Magic Giveaway, which is underway as of November 28th. More information can be found at this topic, which will be updated very soon with further information.

The second contests, is for the chance to win two Seagate FreeAgent external hard drives. More information about this contest can be found here.

These are both amazing contests and I suggest everyone submit an entry for them.

- BleepingComputer Management
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How Good Is Norton?
Stran93r
post Aug 14 2006, 06:27 PM
Post #1


New Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 14-August 06
Member No.: 80,867



Hello, I have Norton Internet Security 2006 and I also have Ewido but I run Norton all the time and Ewindo only when I suspect a problem. My real questions are "How good is Norton?","What is the down/up side of Norton", "What are the alternatives?".
Thanks in advance!


--------------------


The only thing we have to fear is fear it self...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
graveangel
post Aug 14 2006, 06:38 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 398
Joined: 10-April 06
From: Nottingham England Home to the Hood of Robin
Member No.: 63,547



Hello Stran93r and let me be the first to welcome you to BC.

Well i will be short on this one, but you will get many other opinions i can assure you of that.

Norton all-in-all is a very good Anti-Virus, it does as it should and thats what you pay for. There are many anti-Norton users out there, this is mainly because it uses alot of your CPU to run,which hogs the speed at which your computer runs. Its ok on newer systems, but older ones will show a definate decrease in speed with it on them.

Also,once Norton is on your system,it can be a bit of a pain to remove,possible, just awkward.
If you have already paid for the full version of Norton and your system is running at a good speed, then keep it on there. No point in removing it if you have paid for it, unless your system is running really slow.

Yes, there are many other AV's out there that you may wish to switch to once your subscription has expired, some very very good free AV's too. Have a browse around the forum and have a look HERE and see what you find.

Oh, and you should run ewido at least once a week to be sure nothings creeped on there.

Happy browsing
thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by graveangel: Aug 14 2006, 06:44 PM


--------------------
....And on the 8th day God said, "When my children are intelligent, and create the Computer, for my sake may they never screw around with the registry or subscribe to AOL"IPB Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tg1911
post Aug 14 2006, 06:50 PM
Post #3


SPAM Magnet
******

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 13,894
Joined: 6-May 04
From: SW Louisiana
Member No.: 363



Norton is as good as any other Antivirus, since none are perfect.
The biggest complaints about Norton, as graveangel stated, is it's a systen hog (uses a lot of resources), and is a real bear to uninstall.
For some freeware Antivirus alternatives, check graveangel's link, under the Antivirus heading.


--------------------
I love being married.
It's so great to find that one special person you want to annoy, for the rest of your life.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FifeFlyer
post Aug 14 2006, 07:03 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 12-August 06
From: North of Hadrians Wall.
Member No.: 80,484



graveangel , for me you've summed it up perfectly. I don't like Norton for the reasons you stated but i must admit it gives good protection.

Stran93r , my advice............use up your prescription then arm yourself with the freebies , you'll be pleasantly surprised how effective they are. Of course as NIS 2006 includes a firewall and anti spam as well as antivirus you will need separate apps to cover all these areas.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stran93r
post Aug 14 2006, 07:13 PM
Post #5


New Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 14-August 06
Member No.: 80,867



I guess because I've used Norton for so long and it's a brand name it seems like it's the best way to go...but in reality it isn't...


--------------------


The only thing we have to fear is fear it self...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Orange Blossom
post Aug 14 2006, 11:21 PM
Post #6


The Bookworm
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 14-July 06
From: Bloomington, IN
Member No.: 76,150



One other problem that Norton has which may not be an issue for everyone, is that it doesn't scan IMAP mail. My University mail was IMAP, there was no POP option, consequently none of my mail was scanned by Norton - so if you have IMAP mail, make sure to choose a AV that scans IMAP mail, several of them don't.

Guess what? When Panda On-line found 6 related virus files on my computer, they were ALL attached to my IMAP mail, not one to my POP mail which Norton does scan for.

Which reminds me: no one virus checker is 100% perfect, so it's a good idea to occasionally get a 2nd opinion, as it were, from various on-line scanners. Just be sure when you use them that you temporarily turn off the real-time protection to prevent conflicts. Turn it back on when the scanning is finished.

Orange Blossom fruits_cherry.gif


--------------------
Orange Blossom

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

ESET NOD32, AVG Anti-spyware Free, SuperAntiSpyware Pro, SpywareBlaster, Spybot 1.5, WinPatrol Plus, Sunbelt Personal Firewall - Full, Comodo BOClean 4.27, Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, NoScript Firefox ext., Norton noscript
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr Alpha
post Aug 16 2006, 06:47 AM
Post #7


Forum Addict
******

Group: BC Advisor
Posts: 1,875
Joined: 25-November 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 5,870



Maybe I should point out that mail scanning doesn't contribute to your security, since the resident (real-time) scanner will scan the mail when you open it.


--------------------
"Anyone who cannot form a community with others, or who does not need to because he is self-sufficient [...] is either a beast or a god." Aristotle
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe | 2GB Corsair TWINX2048-3500LLPRO | Gigabyte GeForce 8800GTX | Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS | ASUS PhysX P1 | Logitech G15 | Logitech MX Revolution | LG Flatron L2000C | Logitech Z-5500 Digital
Stubborn attempts to think clearly
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Orange Blossom
post Aug 16 2006, 11:46 AM
Post #8


The Bookworm
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 14-July 06
From: Bloomington, IN
Member No.: 76,150



Hmm. So you're saying that it doesn't matter if it's not scanned when it's downloaded? And what about the attachments? From my experience, the real-time mail protection in ZA and in Symantec scan mail as it's downloaded, but Symantec won't do this with IMAP mail. My ZA will even quarantine suspect attachments - as they are downloaded, and I suspect even whole messages if necessary. And there is still the fact that my IMAP mail had virus files whilst my POP mail didn't.

Orange Blossom fruits_cherry.gif


--------------------
Orange Blossom

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

ESET NOD32, AVG Anti-spyware Free, SuperAntiSpyware Pro, SpywareBlaster, Spybot 1.5, WinPatrol Plus, Sunbelt Personal Firewall - Full, Comodo BOClean 4.27, Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, NoScript Firefox ext., Norton noscript
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr Alpha
post Aug 16 2006, 01:20 PM
Post #9


Forum Addict
******

Group: BC Advisor
Posts: 1,875
Joined: 25-November 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 5,870



The mail-scanner scan emails and attachments as they are downloaded. The real-time scanner scan the mail and attachments as they are opened. So technically you scan them twice, and if one doesn't find the virus the other won't either.


--------------------
"Anyone who cannot form a community with others, or who does not need to because he is self-sufficient [...] is either a beast or a god." Aristotle
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe | 2GB Corsair TWINX2048-3500LLPRO | Gigabyte GeForce 8800GTX | Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS | ASUS PhysX P1 | Logitech G15 | Logitech MX Revolution | LG Flatron L2000C | Logitech Z-5500 Digital
Stubborn attempts to think clearly
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
buddy215
post Aug 16 2006, 01:40 PM
Post #10


Forum Addict
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,349
Joined: 14-April 06
Member No.: 64,042



OK, that begs the question--will AVG (that is what I use) alert you if it finds a virus before you download an infected email or attachment? If it does, will deleting the infected email before opening prevent further infection?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Orange Blossom
post Aug 16 2006, 03:19 PM
Post #11


The Bookworm
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 14-July 06
From: Bloomington, IN
Member No.: 76,150



I would think so. I'm a little leary of trusting an as-it's-opened scan. By that point it's been opened it may be too late. It seems to me that it's better to quarantine the bugger before it's opened, especially if there are both recognized and unrecognized viruses in the unopened mail. The latter might not get quarantined upon opening, but it certainly would upon downloading.

How about an analogy: sick animals that need surgery. Is it better to quarantine the sick animal before the surgery begins or after the surgery has begun?

Orange Blossom fruits_cherry.gif

This post has been edited by Orange Blossom: Aug 17 2006, 01:55 AM


--------------------
Orange Blossom

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

ESET NOD32, AVG Anti-spyware Free, SuperAntiSpyware Pro, SpywareBlaster, Spybot 1.5, WinPatrol Plus, Sunbelt Personal Firewall - Full, Comodo BOClean 4.27, Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, NoScript Firefox ext., Norton noscript
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jgweed
post Aug 16 2006, 05:01 PM
Post #12


Forum Addict
******

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 20,642
Joined: 11-April 04
From: Chicago, Il.
Member No.: 113



I think it is useful to remember that many ISPS/E-mail providers will ALSO scan your E-mail and attachments; in this case, your AV is a second layer of protection.
Regards,
John


--------------------
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one should be silent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th December 2008 - 04:33 PM


Advertise   |   About Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Contact Us   |   Site Map   |   Chat   |   Tutorials   |   Uninstall List
Discussion Forums   |   The Computer Glossary   |   Resources   |   RSS Feeds   |   Startups   |   The File Database   |   Malware Removal Guides

© 2003-2008 All Rights Reserved Bleeping Computer LLC.