Can you get a virus just by clicking a link/image?
#1
Posted 20 July 2011 - 09:00 AM
I clean computers every day and regularly have customers come in who claim they did nothing but click a link and have become infected. Sometimes it's email or Facebook links. Other times it's just random websites they happen to click on.
So the question is, can you in fact get a virus/malware/spyware from only clicking on a link?
Thanks in advance for the replies.
#2
Posted 20 July 2011 - 09:20 AM
Even if you're fully patched there are threats that surface for which patches have not yet been written.
The number one way to protect yourself is to practice safe browsing habits.
Google "image poisoning". . . that should shed some light on how clicking an image can result in infection.
Hope that helps,
~Blade

If I am helping you, it has been 48 hours since your last post, and I have yet to reply to your topic, please send me a PM
Become a BleepingComputer fan: Facebook
Follow us on Twitter!
Circle us on Google+
#3
Posted 20 July 2011 - 09:41 AM
DaViD_MiLLs, on 20 July 2011 - 09:00 AM, said:
Short answer: yes.
Longer explanation: it is not the link itself that can infect your computer, but it's actually the content that is downloaded and rendered from said link that can infect your computer.
#4
Posted 20 July 2011 - 11:20 AM
#5
Posted 20 July 2011 - 08:12 PM
Blade, when you talk about the software 'being fully patched' you're talking about everything being up to date and it's most secure, right? Like if you're running Adobe Reader 9 instead of the most up to date version, a bug could slip through because it's has security issues? Same with antivirus programs and everything thing else with the ability to be compromised?
So if a user is running a Norton AV that the subscription has run out on and they just ignore the request to update(resubscribe), just clicking on a link can infect them, without any prompting for downloads or approval?
Didier, thanks for the response. I do understand it's not the link itself. I often click on links that prompt me to download or install fake antivirus/malicious software/spyware though I never allow them to do so.
Frank, I have never gotten into Facebook, but I know a lot of people get infected from Facebook. I do understand what you're saying about legit websites/programs and the hidden content being possibly malicious as well as 'drive by' attacks.
Thanks again for the responses.
#6
Posted 21 July 2011 - 11:14 AM
#7
Posted 21 July 2011 - 04:24 PM
DaViD_MiLLs, on 20 July 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
Blade, when you talk about the software 'being fully patched' you're talking about everything being up to date and it's most secure, right? Like if you're running Adobe Reader 9 instead of the most up to date version, a bug could slip through because it's has security issues? Same with antivirus programs and everything thing else with the ability to be compromised?
Correct

If I am helping you, it has been 48 hours since your last post, and I have yet to reply to your topic, please send me a PM
Become a BleepingComputer fan: Facebook
Follow us on Twitter!
Circle us on Google+
#8
Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:45 PM
Most websites use JavaScript, Flash or ActiveX components to display page elements, read form input, launch pop-up windows or perform other actions. These packages have the ability to do most of the things a native executable program can do - write files to your drive, download content from other locations, and so on.
Even though computer operating systems place limits on what programs can do without specific user intervention and where they can write data, there are always holes in this security. Most of these vulnerabilities are discovered eventually by vendors, security "white hats" or malicious "black hats". Vendors may provide updated versions to secure these vulnerabilities, but users often fail to run updates...
The above is true regardless of which operating system you're using. Windows 7, Mac and Linux are exposed to the same malicious site code as older Windows versions, but the underlying operating systems have fewer exploited vulnerabilities.
Many holes don't get patched before malware writers exploit them, so websites are an ideal way to expose thousands or millions of potentially vulnerable computers to infection. This malware distribution model is so effective that popular legitimate sites (MSNBC and the New York Times are recent examples) and advertising distributors have been repeatedly hacked to insert malicious code.
If your browser doesn't have the correct limits on what scripts and plug-ins can do, and your operating system is vulnerable, a website with malicious code can initiate a malware download and installation onto your computer without any other intervention. When you click on a link in HTML e-mail, your browser attempts to load that site and runs any scripts specified in its code just as if you had entered the URL in an open browser window.
Google Chrome 12, Firefox 5 and Internet Explorer 9 browser versions "sandbox" running scripts to help ensure that any changes they make are temporary and erased when the browser closes - everyone should upgrade to one of these browsers.
#9
Posted 26 July 2011 - 08:49 AM
Blade Zephon, on 21 July 2011 - 04:24 PM, said:
DaViD_MiLLs, on 20 July 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
Blade, when you talk about the software 'being fully patched' you're talking about everything being up to date and it's most secure, right? Like if you're running Adobe Reader 9 instead of the most up to date version, a bug could slip through because it's has security issues? Same with antivirus programs and everything thing else with the ability to be compromised?
Correct
Thanks.
Patience, that is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the post.

Help

Back to top










