We're surmising it's because the 1st and 2nd positions are being held for IDE drives. The standard device allocation for EIDE allows two Master and two Slave drives. This reference shows them included among all the standard device resource allocations made by the BIOS:
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/mbsys/res/config_Summary.htm
"The entries in bold represent the default resource usage in a typical PC; entries in regular text are optional resource allocations, or resources used by optional or non-standard devices"
Presented in a different form:
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/mbsys/res/ioSummary-c.html
At port address 1F0-1FFh the Primary IDE controller, master drive - at address 170-17Fh the Secondary IDE controller, master drive. So to the BIOS, these two IDE drives' standard locations would be 1st Master, 2nd Master.
Even if they do not currently attach to a drive, a drive using another interface, eg the SATA controller on the motherboard, will not be located at either of those addresses but will have a third address, so it will be logical for the BIOS to classify it as 3rd Master.
As I said in post #3:
"If your BIOS leaves 1st & 2nd Master slots free for possible future IDE drives, the SATA drive becomes 3rd Master."
This post has been edited by Platypus: 01 October 2010 - 08:08 AM