BleepingComputer.com: One of my Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor cores has a temperature consistently lower than the other 3 cores, WHY?

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

One of my Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor cores has a temperature consistently lower than the other 3 cores, WHY? My processor is Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83GHz 12MB L2 Cach

#1 User is offline   montecarlo1987 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 12-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY State

Posted 10 November 2009 - 12:35 PM

Hello. I have a question. I need to know the reason why one of my cores (Core 2) is running about 3-4 degrees below the temperatures of the other 3 cores on my Intel Core 2 Q9550 Quad processor. My processor is Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83GHz 12MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Quad-Core Processor.
Restarting and rebooting seems not to help, it is always the same core with the lower temperature. Is there something wrong with that particular core or something overly defective with the processor itself??? It rarely ever fluctuates and stays at 33 degrees Celsius. The other core temperatures are around 36-38 degrees at rest/idle and do frequently go up when an action is performed on the computer. I began this temperature check a few days ago, and now for the last few days it is at 33 degrees.

Please let me know what is going on with this consistent lower core 2 temperature and please provide me with a reason why this is happening. Is it something that is beginning to die with this processor? Is there anything that can be done about it to get all four (4) core temperatures in balance.

Thank you!

#2 User is offline   xXAlphaXx 

  • Distinguished Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 776
  • Joined: 15-November 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Carlona

Posted 10 November 2009 - 02:14 PM

My guess would be that Core 2 is maybe a core that isn't used first if an intensive program is launched, Maybe the system uses Cores 1,3,4 before 2. I'm not sure, I could be wrong.

Well, I personally woulden't stress if those are the real temps as they do not seem too be overheating at all

Oh and if your using it, speedfan is very unreliable IMO.

This post has been edited by xXAlphaXx: 10 November 2009 - 02:15 PM

If I am helping you and I do not respond within 24 hours, please send me a PM. :)

#3 User is offline   the_patriot11 

  • High Tech Redneck
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: BC Advisor
  • Posts: 5,209
  • Joined: 03-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wyoming USA

Posted 10 November 2009 - 10:28 PM

could be a miriad of things, like alpha said the computer not using that core before the others or as much, or just windows being windows. I dont know what OS your using, but XP does not fully support multiple cores, and neither does vista. Sure, theyll recognize and use them all, even vista will, but they cannot completly use all of them 100% efficiently. I dont know about windows 7. So it could be a windows quirk. Could also just be temperature sensor being misread as well. As long as everything seems fine, and the temps on all 4 cores are within acceptable limits, I wouldnt stress yourself out to much over it. every computer has its quirks.
Posted Image
Primary system: Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3, Processor: AMD Phenom II x4 945, Memory: 8 gigs of Patriot G2 DDR3 1600, Video: ASUS ATI 4890 and a Saphire 4890 in Crossfire, Storage: 1 WD 500 gig HD, 1 Hitachi 500 gig HD, and Power supply: Coolermaster 750 watt, OS: Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit.
Media Center: Motherboard: Gigabyte mp61p-S3, Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+, Memory: 6 gigs Patriot DDR2 800, Video: Saphire 4850, Storage: 500 gig Hitachi, PSU: OCZ Fatal1ty 550 watt modular PSU, OS: Windows 7 Ultimate.
If I don't reply within 24 hours of your reply, feel free to send me a pm.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users