Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.Classic Cars Classic Cars of the Future
#1
Posted 18 September 2009 - 06:26 AM
#2
Posted 18 September 2009 - 07:57 AM
American car makers are going back to that. The new style Mustang and Dodge Challenger look like updated versions of the 70's models.
Mechanics today learn how to do all the computer stuff, I hope, on the the new cars so I don't think that will affect the classic car craze. People pass down to thier kids how to fix them, and just like before, since computers are all over the place, people will figure out what to do..
Ronald Reagan
#3
Posted 20 September 2009 - 03:54 PM
no offence wildabeast but no american cars can be described as classics.theyre slow ugly and cant turn corners like european cars
This post has been edited by trollocks: 20 September 2009 - 03:55 PM
#4
Posted 20 September 2009 - 04:25 PM
#5 Guest_The weatherman_*
Posted 20 September 2009 - 04:45 PM
#6
Posted 20 September 2009 - 09:35 PM
Ronald Reagan
#7
Posted 20 September 2009 - 09:58 PM
trollocks, on Sep 20 2009, 03:54 PM, said:
no offence wildabeast but no american cars can be described as classics.theyre slow ugly and cant turn corners like european cars
HAH?!?! WHAT?!?!
69 Camaro with a 406 upwards of 800 horsepower off the bottle...right dude dont screw with that thing it pulls corners faster than you reach em..
Or the 70 chevelle with 1200 hp also off the bottle...
81 monte carlo capable of ridin on the bumper with only 600 horsepower...so much torque you can skid on your roof in first gear...
Dude..A golf GTI comes with v6 and around 211 horsepower..
Nearly any muscle car comes stock with 400+
when I say off bottle I mean WITHOUT NOS...imagine if we pushed the button lol..
Lol get real bro. I dont know anything about computers but try to talk about cars because I'll stay with ya there.
This post has been edited by KingofDestruction: 20 September 2009 - 09:59 PM
#8
Posted 21 September 2009 - 04:11 AM
I believe none of the current generation of Cars,will ever become a true Classic.
They are just heaps of plastic on wheels.Only got to have a touch and plastic is laying everywhere on the roadway.
They also only have a short lifespan,because who in their right mind would try and restore one of these "Plastic Fantastics"?
Real Men drive American Classics.
I have owned quite a few,and the favourites I owned, were a 1967 GTO Pontiac, and a '69 Mach 1 428 Cobra Jet.
Give me steel and Chrome,and a thumping V/8 any Day.
#9
Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:52 AM
Head on collision test between 1959 Chevy and 2009 Chevy.
Wouldn't you?
The driver of the 2009 would have a better chance of living to be a "classic", and that just might be an important consideration.
#10
Posted 21 September 2009 - 12:28 PM
DSTM, on Sep 21 2009, 04:11 AM, said:
I believe none of the current generation of Cars,will ever become a true Classic.
They are just heaps of plastic on wheels.Only got to have a touch and plastic is laying everywhere on the roadway.
They also only have a short lifespan,because who in their right mind would try and restore one of these "Plastic Fantastics"?
Real Men drive American Classics.
I have owned quite a few,and the favourites I owned, were a 1967 GTO Pontiac, and a '69 Mach 1 428 Cobra Jet.
Give me steel and Chrome,and a thumping V/8 any Day.
I agree and disagree. While the V8 is a good engine. Any engine could be made fast. Ive got a 99 saturn sl2 that runs competition over all over town. Just saying.
#11
Posted 24 September 2009 - 03:29 PM
But, in today's world, there might be a few cars that are considered "Classics."
Maybe in 30 so years, the new Camero might be considered a "Classic".
I, myself, would say some of the Halo Models of Ferrari, Audi, and possibly Mercedes have a chance of "Classic", but everyone is entitled to their opinion..
(I'm pretty sure in 30 years, people will pay millions for a Ferrari Enzo..)
#12
Posted 24 September 2009 - 04:10 PM
Todays cars are designed to break down and force you to buy a new one or have expensive repairs done to it. fact of life. The Classic car is dead! All hail the classic car!
#13
Posted 24 September 2009 - 04:25 PM
Okay, maybe not, but true. Most production cars today are cheaper then they once were (in Purchase Price Power) in the 70's. Why? The material used is now a lot more abundant is much more cheaper. The cars are no longer man made, they have robots producing them, such as in Honda and Toyota's case. Plus, have you seen a car crash? These car's get TORN apart. Literally.
#14
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:09 AM
BlackSpyder, on Sep 25 2009, 07:10 AM, said:
Todays cars are designed to break down and force you to buy a new one or have expensive repairs done to it. fact of life. The Classic car is dead! All hail the classic car!
My Thoughts,Exactly, BlackSpyder.
#15
Posted 27 September 2009 - 04:57 AM

Help


Back to top

















