So my price range is about $6-800. I do favor Intel, but as far as anything else goes I'm not sure about what's good and what's not so good. So any help is great! :-D
Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.Ready to Build
#1
Posted 10 August 2009 - 10:00 AM
So my price range is about $6-800. I do favor Intel, but as far as anything else goes I'm not sure about what's good and what's not so good. So any help is great! :-D
#2
Posted 10 August 2009 - 12:36 PM
After doing this, you can truly decide what you want and what you don't need in a system.
I would start with understanding why the motherboard and the PSU are probably the most important components, pretty much dictating everything else in a generic fashion.
The CPU...is a selling point used by retailers, but it is not the most important choice a user makes (IMO).
http://www.pantherproducts.co.uk/Articles/...therboard.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motherboard
http://www.atxpowersupplies.com/choosing-a-power-supply.htm
Once you find a motherboard you like...that feels like what you want...then you can worry about selecting an appropriate CPU.
Louis
#3
Posted 10 August 2009 - 12:52 PM
This post has been edited by dpunisher: 10 August 2009 - 12:54 PM
#4
Posted 11 August 2009 - 02:39 AM
Yes, & they will be sky high for the 1st. year ay least.
The Socket 1156 motherboards will be too.
Whenever new stuff is released that won't run on any old stiff the price stays high until the co starts making a profit on iy.
Once they at least break even the price will see a drop.
This has happened with every new CPU & socket combination & the i5/1156 is going to be no different.
CPU's & new socket motherboards are like cars to me in 1 way.
I wouldn't buy either as soon as they come out, I* wait at least a year.
The greatest depreciation is in the first yeart.
I also like to let others weed out the problem components.
If 100 people buy a motherboard & 65 have a problem with it I know to avoid it.
#5
Posted 11 August 2009 - 06:11 AM
Mid level i5 looks to be about $280 US, and at that price will dust any Core 2 offerings. Socket 775 is dead to future upgrades. You can put together a faster i5 system for less than a Core 2. Core 2 quads are still near $300 for Q9650s.
#7
Posted 11 August 2009 - 11:55 AM
Cenfath, on Aug 11 2009, 09:18 AM, said:
Yes.
For really good/entertaining PSU reviews: http://www.jonnyguru.com/
#8
Posted 11 August 2009 - 12:57 PM
dpunisher, on Aug 11 2009, 06:11 AM, said:
Mid level i5 looks to be about $280 US, and at that price will dust any Core 2 offerings. Socket 775 is dead to future upgrades. You can put together a faster i5 system for less than a Core 2. Core 2 quads are still near $300 for Q9650s.
You can't actually beleive you can build a i5 system for less then a C2D system.
Then to try & skew it in your favor you compare the cost of a "mid level i5" to the cost of the most expensive top end 775 QUAD CORE
Lets compare a $280. mid level i5 to a $120. mid level C2D.
I seriously doubt the average user is going to find enough difference to justify the extra $160.
You're talking about a $280. CPU & I can build a complete unit for $400. that any average home user would be happy with.
The simple fact is "cutting edge" newly released components are being recommended for a $700. build.
Blow $380. on a motherboard/CPU that leaves $320. for a case, PSU. memory video card, DVD drive, & hard drive.
Even with the extra C note the OP is allowing for cheap components would have to be bought to get everything.
So basically a person gets a new motherboard & CPU & a cheap everything else.
A person would be farther ahead to invest in a good socket 775 unit running a good C2D .
BTW, Since the new i5 stuff is going to be so inexpensive are you going to replace all of your "old" stuff as soon as the i5 stuff is released ?
If the answer is no, why not ?
This post has been edited by fairjoeblue: 11 August 2009 - 01:15 PM
#9
Posted 11 August 2009 - 04:34 PM
If you don't want to worry about "cutting edge" and don't need the horsepower for games etc, there is nothing wrong with going a Core2 setup, but you have "0" upgrade path. If it came down to choosing between a Core2 and a new AMD setup, AMD would be my choice at this point.
As far as: "BTW, Since the new i5 stuff is going to be so inexpensive are you going to replace all of your "old" stuff as soon as the i5 stuff is released ?"
I already have a nice i7 920 on a EX58-UD4P schlepping along at 3.5ghz. A bit pointless to clock it further until I can update my 4870 in a few months. The IP35 Pro/E6750 it replaced is doing fine in my HTPC setup.
"Lets compare a $280. mid level i5 to a $120. mid level C2D."
You can compare them, but what's the point? For the price of a cheapie Intel setup, he could build a quicker AMD setup. If you don't need a lightning fast system, that doesn't have an upgrade path, grab a Core 2 and a P45 board and build away. Nothing wrong with that as long as you realize the limitations and future of that setup.
#10
Posted 11 August 2009 - 07:00 PM
I fully understand that it's very easy to talk cutting edge , but not neccessarily to a person on a budget.
#11
Posted 11 August 2009 - 09:16 PM
http://www.tomshardware.com/us/
http://www.motherboards.org/
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/
Maybe you will find some info here too.
Dan
#12
Posted 12 August 2009 - 02:57 AM
(Nytwind)
#13
Posted 12 August 2009 - 01:37 PM
#14
Posted 12 August 2009 - 01:40 PM
#15
Posted 12 August 2009 - 03:35 PM
Ordinary computers (not built for gamers) generally serve the needs of us ordinary mortals. But that would never do if you game, feel obsessed with having a particular item, etc.
The only requirement to do a lot graphics editing (IMO) is more than 2GB of RAM and a decent program to utilize. Look at the system specs posited for the program...double or triple the RAM (as you like) and you pretty have it down.
And Photoshop has an excellent user forum where you can get some ideas of what works and what doesn't.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=p...rum&aqi=g10
Photoshop has been around for some time, so there is a history that can be relied on...more so than our speculations on what's needed to use it effectively.
Louis

Help


Back to top










