Good programs for website creation.
#16
Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:32 AM
php Coder
WebCoder
Site Sinc
Expression
Evrsoft First Page
Antenna (CSS)
Sothink
ShowKit2 (flash)
Xara Extreme beats Photoshop hands down UNLESS the person using photoshop is an expert
On the other hand, XARA makes everyone look like an expert!
#17
Posted 29 March 2010 - 10:35 AM
IKnowSEO
#18
Posted 08 April 2010 - 03:34 AM
Now that I use Ubuntu Linux I have discovered gedit, which is a very capable syntax highlighting text editor with support for HTML, css, JavaScript, python, bash, and many other languages. It is available for windows as well.
It comes with the ability to add plug ins, some of which are ones which allow you a file folder view in a side pane that you can load files from, to insert custom text snippets into files by typing specially defined words and hitting tab after you type those words, complete html code insertion side pane you can double click on code elements to add them, etc...
Gedit is hands down the very best text editor I have ever used. I use it for all of my programming chores now.
Get gedit here - http://projects.gnome.org/gedit/ The Windows binary link is on the right hand side of the page.
Listen to my brilliant guitar playing !!
The Unknown Lead Player
Linux dpkg Software Report
Ray's Links, Human reviewed link index
Writings of the Schizophrenic
#19
Posted 28 October 2010 - 04:15 PM
#20
Posted 01 November 2010 - 02:14 PM
They track and present me with search engine keyword presense for each of the main keywords on each web page and they track traffic. One of my websites is several years old now and very successful. Anyway, html coding seems to get a higher search engine ranking in google compared to .php from what I've seen.
http://www.hydroponics-at-home.com
http://abuseaddiction.com
#21
Posted 01 November 2010 - 09:27 PM
Quote
Yeah, that sort of doesn't make sense because a web spider can't tell the difference between a page coded in straight HTML, or a page that was created by PHP. In the end, it is just HTML.
#22
Posted 25 January 2011 - 04:15 AM
Stofzuiger, on 30 May 2009 - 08:20 AM, said:
link: http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm
Stick to this. I would recommend avoiding software like Dreamweaver for serious coding.
#23
Posted 15 August 2011 - 11:20 PM
Has anyone heard of, or is using Microsoft’s WebMatrix? http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/
A few months ago I was drawn back into web development and discovered this recently released version and have been using it ever since. I could not be happier with the way this tool has been able to get me up to speed on all the various ways and tools that are available to create top notch sites, as complicated or as simple as needed.
From what I understand about WebMatrix is that it was originally released years ago and neglected by MS, just to be reborn the end of last year. They certainly have put some effort into this and it works hand in hand with their .net framework. Websites in cshtml are a snap adding dynamic server code using the new “Razor” syntax.
I would be interested in hearing from other users and if the response warrants, opening a new topic to bat around our experiences. This bad boy does it all.
Noah
This post has been edited by groovicus: 16 August 2011 - 07:58 AM
#24
Posted 14 November 2011 - 10:02 PM
Some programs other members have mentioned in the past:
Microsoft Office SharePoint Web Designer 2007 and Microsoft Expression Web Designer.
Adobe Dreamweaver
FirstPage
Pagebreeze
Coffee Cup HTML editor
PhpDesigner
Notepad (don't laugh, it works!)
#25
Posted 30 December 2011 - 06:12 PM
Can anyone recommend a similar piece of software that does the same thing? MS Office SharePoint Designer possibly?
#26
Posted 01 January 2012 - 02:46 AM
Here is what you will not be able to do:
Quote
The following components require FrontPage 2000 Server Extensions or later:
Nested subwebs
Lightweight Source Control (document check-in/check-out without Microsoft Visual SourceSafe for Windows)
Categories component
StyleSheet links to multiple files or Active Server Pages (ASP) files
FrontPage Server Extensions Components
Additionally, the following components require at least an earlier version of the FrontPage Server Extensions:
Confirmation field
Discussion form handler
FrontPage-created server-side image maps
Hit counter
Registration form handler
Save Results form handler
Search form
Per: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/232524
So if you do not have any of those needs you can still use Frontpage.
My work schedule is as follows: Mon and Tues 1800 to 0600, Friday - Sunday 1800EST to 0600, and Wednesday to Thursday 1800est to 0600. So if I do not respond right away I am at work.
----------------
If I am helping you, then Please Send Me a Message!with your thread link in it. This is only if I haven't replied back to you within 24 to 48 hours.
----------------
My Main Site || My Backup Site || steam://friends/add/cryptodan Add me to your Steam Friends.
#27
Posted 04 February 2012 - 11:46 AM
I don't really care about anything else, including the GUI or preview system, in fact I'd be perfectly happy if it were text only since I really want to hand code things. It is just very annoying going back over all your pages to add a single link to the navigation bar or make some similar change, but nor is it quite worth writing a script to do that.
This post has been edited by JosiahK: 04 February 2012 - 11:46 AM
I don't read minds. Please help everyone by answering any questions and reporting on the results of any instructions. Query any concerns and explain problems or complications.
#28
Posted 04 February 2012 - 06:37 PM
Try here and see if this helps:
http://friendlybit.com/html/html-includes/
If not, I can perhaps provide an example.
#29
Posted 05 February 2012 - 08:55 AM
That being as is, what's the advantage of using templates in the first place?
I don't read minds. Please help everyone by answering any questions and reporting on the results of any instructions. Query any concerns and explain problems or complications.
#30
Posted 05 February 2012 - 10:58 AM
How you do your menu template is irrelevant. It is the fact that one uses a template in the first place.
This post has been edited by groovicus: 05 February 2012 - 10:58 AM

Help



Back to top












