:: why do you want to ply with Zips? when you can burn
:: CDs at a fraction of one zip diskette?
For a couple of reasons. The first is cost. Yes, a single CD is cheaper than a single Zip disk, but there is also the hidden "negative cost" of reuse. (huh?) Once a CD is burned, it's burned. You can't erase it and start over. So, if I transfer files from my old clunker (with no USB or ethernet -- it's that old!) in ten trips, I've wasted 10 CDs, but I still have a Zip disk that I can use. So, even though it's more expensive, it's more cost-effective to use reusable media.
Second, believe it or not, is because once a year, I have to burn a particular CD. One of my clients' clients puts his web site on a CD every year, to give away as a sort of "catalog" (can you say, "braindead"?). And every year, we go through 50-60 changes to come up with one arrangement that everyone likes. That's 50-60 burned, useless, toss-em-in-a-landfill or use-em-for coasters CDs. Or one Zip disk.
As I've mentioned before, I'm a cheap SOB. And, in the long run, CDs are *way* more expensive than Zip disks.
-garison