Can Someone Explain Whats Going On With The Economy And The Banks And What Will Fix It?
#31
Posted 27 September 2008 - 08:15 PM
Sure I was pretty steamed over this whole wall street thing, and it takes me some time to put it into perspective. I try not to be so attached to the outcome so that I can enjoy the life that goes on around me.
Oh yes, and kill the undeserving.
#32
Posted 30 September 2008 - 09:35 AM
What do you guys think about the failed buyout plan?
#33
Posted 30 September 2008 - 04:38 PM
I'll not say much more because I don't know if the US Government will try to push it through again as unlikely as it may seem but George Bush is trying to put it through again, I don't think it will go through because around 90 of his own Democrats refused it before what makes him think they will change there minds.
Should add on while US National Debt is rising the UK Government think they can Decrease ours by £60 Billion or $120 Billion by March, So £10 Billion A Month to put us back under the 40% GDP Safe Mark for Debt.
Something that I found is interesting a National Debt Clock for the US - http://zfacts.com/p/461.html
Supposedly your National Debt is increasing by $1 Million about every 80 Seconds or $2.56 Billion a Day on Average for a Year now
That Link is a bit out of Date here is a more Updated One - http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
This post has been edited by woodyblade: 30 September 2008 - 05:14 PM
“Programming Today Is A Race Between Software Engineers Stirring To Build Bigger And Better Idiot-Proof Programs, And The Universe Trying To Produce Bigger And Better Idiots. So Far, The Universe Is Winning.”
People Have The Right To Be Stupid, But Some Abuse That Privilege.
#34
Posted 30 September 2008 - 06:31 PM
Just for the sake of accuracy, George Bush is a Republican, and it is the Republicans who largely failed to support the plan.
#35
Posted 01 October 2008 - 12:17 AM
Ronald Reagan
#36
Posted 01 October 2008 - 01:58 AM
A lot of the constituents of some of theses Senators and Congressmen have made it clear that if they vote in favor of any bailout, they'll be looking for new jobs at the next election.
The people that have no interest in these banking corporations - the majority of American taxpayers - should not have their tax dollars spent on getting these megacorps out of the trouble that they got themselves into in the first place.
#37
Posted 01 October 2008 - 02:16 AM
Just for the sake of accuracy, George Bush is a Republican, and it is the Republicans who largely failed to support the plan.
[/quote]
Thanks for the Heads up on that American Politics aren't my best subject. I think I read it was over a 100 Republicans who voted against the Bail-Out.
“Programming Today Is A Race Between Software Engineers Stirring To Build Bigger And Better Idiot-Proof Programs, And The Universe Trying To Produce Bigger And Better Idiots. So Far, The Universe Is Winning.”
People Have The Right To Be Stupid, But Some Abuse That Privilege.
#38
Posted 01 October 2008 - 07:46 AM
I have not had tie to compare the original proposal with the one that was ultimately voted on, but my understanding is that Democrats added provisions to extend coverage to other bad debts, such as credit cards, student loans, etc. I remember reading it on MSN, but I can not find the article that it was in, and not that MSN is the most unbiased place for getting one's news. If this is true, it would explain why so many Democrats rallied behind the bill, and so many Republicans opposed it.
Like I said, I have not read the proposal as it was voted on, so I am not sure.
#39
Posted 01 October 2008 - 11:37 PM
I say let it do what its going to do on its own or give the Americans 200,000 per person over 18. If we all had that money we could pay off our debts and help the economy. If they give it to the banks they are the only ones gaining anything.
#40
Posted 02 October 2008 - 12:42 AM
As I understand it, the financial crisis has caused credit markets to freeze, because banks sitting on mountains of bad debt (ninja loans) are reluctant to lend money. Subsequently, individuals and businesses won't have access to credit/loans. This will cause a significant slow-down in economic activity. So by giving the $700 billion to the banks (buying the bad debt), they hope to free up the credit markets and prevent a severe economic slow-down.
So it's not only the banks who will gain anything. By freeing up the credit markets and avoiding (or reducing) an recession, everybody gains.
In theory at least
—George Bernard Shaw
#41
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:25 AM
I wonder if that was taken out of the bill the Senate passed today....
Ronald Reagan
#42 Guest_Abacus 7_*
Posted 02 October 2008 - 03:25 AM
The Roman Empire used to use the Eagle as a Symbol? One of their Caesars, Nero, played a Fiddle whilst Rome Burned? Sound like now? Nero had no support from the Senate? Looking like some thing similar?
Rome, like many World Super Powers was destroyed by Internal Forces, not External.
America is looking straight down the Gun Barrel to join Rome and all the rest.
The latest Offer to the Senate just compounds the Problem, not even a quick fix, yet the World hovers on what to do?
Something to consider? What if China and all other Countries that are heavily invested in America, called in their Debts? America would have a Big Problem?
Edit? A quick look at the involvement of Aussie Companies for one Example, will soon show that not only Americans are involved here. Check out other Countries involved?
This post has been edited by Abacus 7: 02 October 2008 - 03:37 AM
#43
Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:05 AM
The improper use of capital letters is offensive. But not the comments.
#44 Guest_Abacus 7_*
Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:28 AM
The improper use of capital letters is offensive. But not the comments.
[/quote]
Sorry about that, Mate!
#45
Posted 02 October 2008 - 08:58 AM
Still I say give the money to the people and not the banks.

Help



Back to top













