European Army Good idea or no?
#1
Posted 20 July 2008 - 02:58 PM
There are obvious problems in creating this military. Language barriers and the many military equipment development companies from the different countries are but two.
The European Army, if it ever happens, would cause friction with the US which I think is what some Europeans want.
For this reason I am against it's creation as I think are most of the people from the UK.
#2
Posted 20 July 2008 - 07:11 PM
#3
Posted 20 July 2008 - 07:39 PM
Just wondering.[/quote]
It's a possibility of course, but the rapid response force is to be made up of current equipment and forces, and so there would be no increase in arms production.
I think any future Euro army would be made by countries allocating most, if not all of there current defense budget. Nearly all current troops would probably have to be a part of the army.
I can see no pratical need for the army. It is said by some that the army is needed to ensure that Europe dosen't start fighting amongst themselves again.
Here is what Angela Merkel said in 2007:
This is from an interview with timesonline. Won't link to it because of warnings of adware from Siteadvisor users.
[quote]Angela Merkel got Europe’s 50th birthday weekend off to a controversial start yesterday when she said that the creation of a European army should be a key goal in its next 50 years.
The German Chancellor added hastily that she did not want to steer Europe towards a federal superstate. But her words ignited a simmering row about the relationship between Nato and the growing number of small EU military missions.
Mrs Merkel said that peace could not be taken for granted despite Western Europe’s longest period without internal conflict and suggested that a common army could help to bind countries closer together. Her suggestion was shot down immediately by Britain, which strongly opposes the creation of a rival organisation to Nato, although it does support the limited EU joint rapid reaction units sent to help out in crisis areas such as Aceh, hit by the 2005 tsunami.[/quote]
I just don't think it's needed.
#4
Posted 29 July 2008 - 05:32 AM
Uniting separate countries' armies when necessary worked perfectly well in two world wars.
Typical Euro babble from people paid to talk
m0le is a proud member of UNITE (Unified Network of Instructors and Trusted Eliminators)
#5
Posted 29 July 2008 - 07:10 AM
[quote]Typical Euro babble from people paid to talk.[/quote]
Though I agree with that, if this army ever formed, it would cause tension with the US and cause others to tremble. Think of the past of certain European countries, especially ourselves, France and Germany.
Of course, this past doesn't mean anything in the slightest about intentions of the future but certain people will not see it like that.
#6
Posted 29 July 2008 - 09:14 AM
Pretty big if, I think.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight.Hide not your talents. They for use were made. What's a sundial in the shade?~ Benjamin Franklin I am a Bleeping Computer fan! Are you? Facebook Follow us on Twitter
#7
Posted 29 July 2008 - 09:34 AM
Expect it to be announced by the EU any day now
m0le is a proud member of UNITE (Unified Network of Instructors and Trusted Eliminators)
#8
Posted 29 July 2008 - 09:38 AM
Maybe, but don't underestimate those, and there are still many, who wish for a Federal Europe.
[quote]Expect it to be announced by the EU any day now[/quote]
This post has been edited by KingOfIdiocy: 29 July 2008 - 09:40 AM
#10
Posted 29 July 2008 - 05:22 PM
—George Bernard Shaw
#11
Posted 29 July 2008 - 06:01 PM
Well, there is Angela Merkel, as stated in the 3rd post. It has always been lauded by Valéry Giscard d’Estaing.
#12
Posted 29 July 2008 - 06:46 PM
Personally I can't really see any huge benefit to a European Army and I can't see all the member countries agreeing on it anyway. Although, if all they're talking about is a scaled up version of the rapid reaction forces that's a different thing.
—George Bernard Shaw
#13
Posted 29 July 2008 - 06:59 PM
No, as of yet anyway.
[quote]though, if all they're talking about is a scaled up version of the rapid reaction forces that's a different
thing.[/quote]
Be could it then be a case of 'Let's scale it up some more, a little more, more, just a little more', and so on?
[url="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/07/eu.france"]http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/07/eu.france[/url]
This may be a sign of things to come.
Everyone so far are agreeing it's a bad idea.
This post has been edited by KingOfIdiocy: 29 July 2008 - 07:00 PM
#14
Posted 29 July 2008 - 07:33 PM
—George Bernard Shaw
#15
Posted 23 August 2008 - 04:39 PM
Well, there is Angela Merkel, as stated in the 3rd post. It has always been lauded by Valéry Giscard d’Estaing.
[/quote]
Just seen this thread so will put my 2 cents in.
Trust a German to want to make a European Army they just want us British in it, their not bothered about France and Italy (Who are Surrender Monkeys). The Germans just don't want to be beaten again.
I wouldn't want it created at all, I rather we focus on our own Army, maybe recruit a few more Troops, or take a leaf from the French Books and make a Foreign Legion, "British Foreign Legion" got a ring to it
“Programming Today Is A Race Between Software Engineers Stirring To Build Bigger And Better Idiot-Proof Programs, And The Universe Trying To Produce Bigger And Better Idiots. So Far, The Universe Is Winning.”
People Have The Right To Be Stupid, But Some Abuse That Privilege.

Help



Back to top














