BleepingComputer.com: Physical Memory Usage

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Physical Memory Usage I need clarification on what it means

#1 User is offline   rman56 

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 07 May 2008 - 02:59 PM

First off, I apologize if I am not doing this properly, but I always seem to have a problem of not knowing exactly where to post something, especially with so many pages to look through for a specific topic. That said...

I just bought an emachines T3642, AMD Athlon 4000+, single core and very good, Vista Home Premium. I have a question as to what it actually means when I open up my Task Manager and I read this at the bottom of the Task Manager Window.

Processes running are generally between upper 50's and lower 60's, CPU usage is generally between 2% and 7%, but the Physical memory is rarely if ever under low 60's%. What I'm asking is does that mean that I'm using 61% of my 1 gig of memory that came with this unit and if so, is that a high number. You know a lot of stuff comes preinstalled and I'm always worried about uninstalling anything that I didn't install myself for fear of doing damage to my computer.

Also, when I initially open the Task Manager, in the CPU Usage area, anywhere from 80 to 100% will flash for a moment, and then drop down to the single digits percentage. I am aware of a lot of processes running in background, but should I be concerned about the 80 to 100% that does flash for just that moment.

Whatever information you need I will be glad to provide. I'm not a computer expert. I just like to have a machine that runs as fast and as efficiently as it can, and I'd like to understand a little bit about the basics. I didn't seem to notice the high physical memory numbers when I had my last computer with XP Home, but I ruined that machine over a year ago and can't remember for sure.

Thanks for any help you can provide and sorry if this should be somewhere else.

#2 User is offline   MishY 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 113
  • Joined: 03-May 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 May 2008 - 03:08 PM

My memory usage is about the same with not much running in the background. I've heard Vista gobbles up alot of memory which I guess is a good thing cause more stuff running in memory means it's not coming from the much slower hard drive.

#3 User is offline   DJBPace07 

  • Forum Addict
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: BC Advisor
  • Posts: 3,876
  • Joined: 24-June 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bridgeport, WV

Posted 07 May 2008 - 11:06 PM

Vista is much better with memory than XP. Vista also uses SuperFetch which pre-loads your most frequently used programs, including background programs, into memory to make them load faster. Should a program need the space, the program is unloaded and space is given.
Posted Image

#4 User is offline   usasma 

  • Still visually handicapped, new avatar (a camel) :0)
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Find Topics
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16,690
  • Joined: 02-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southeastern CT, USA

Posted 08 May 2008 - 06:50 AM

Here's a link to a technical article on Windows memory improvements: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysin...als/memmgt.mspx
And here's an excellent discussion about the "quirks" in displaying memory statistics, even though it was published prior to Vista (works best in IE): http://www.microsoft.com/emea/spotlight/se...001491050E0E6C3

FWIW - I've got 8 gB of RAM on 64 bit Vista and it's running around 60% for me also.
- John
**If you need a more detailed explanation, please ask for it. I have the Knack. **

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users