Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help Forums Windows Startup Programs Database Spyware and Malware Removal Guides Computer Tutorials Uninstall Database File Database Computer Glossary Computer Resources
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Click here to Register a free account now! )



Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to Bleeping Computer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.
Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Large Ram Usage
Learner87
post Nov 29 2007, 04:07 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 87,691



I found that my windows consume lots of RAM (70% above) even my RAM is 1GB. Firstly i tot that i'm infected, but the scanning result shows nothing. what is the problem?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
figgis41
post Nov 29 2007, 04:37 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-May 07
From: Hull England
Member No.: 129,329



hi,,,, win vista uses nearly all the ram with superfetch, but gives it back instantly when called for,,,, take a look at this link

http://www.vistadiscuss.com/windows-vista-...-sucks/2006/09/

just google superfetch & take a look,,, also if you can maybe add another gig of ram you'll find vista opperates alot smoother with 2 gig of ram,,,,,,,,,,good luck


--------------------
Figgis,,,, LUFC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Learner87
post Nov 29 2007, 06:52 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 87,691



Thnks.... figgis.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deanpcmad
post Nov 30 2007, 03:50 PM
Post #4


Forum Regular
***

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 10-September 07
From: Southampton, UK
Member No.: 155,912



Hey,

I have the same problem!

deanpcmad


--------------------
deanpcmad
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
williamjohnson
post Nov 30 2007, 05:04 PM
Post #5


New Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 6-November 07
Member No.: 167,914



I use a utility (system mechanic) to defrag my ram. after this I use around 460MB
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
figgis41
post Dec 1 2007, 11:16 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-May 07
From: Hull England
Member No.: 129,329



hi all,, i have 2 gig of DDR2 and according to task manager its all being used but as soon as i do something on my pc its instant as its given back from the cach
[attachment=2875:Capture.JPG]

as you can see its all cached but in the memory box you see that my machine's only using about 750meg,,, this is the all new vista way with the superfetch,,, up to now i've had no probs with my pc speeds or game playing so im happy,,,,,, up to now,,,lol
good luck all


--------------------
Figgis,,,, LUFC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PoweredByGoogle
post Dec 5 2007, 01:58 AM
Post #7


Forum Regular
***

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 1-November 07
Member No.: 166,999



it uses that much just for the os
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
figgis41
post Dec 5 2007, 11:49 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-May 07
From: Hull England
Member No.: 129,329



its realy using 37%, the rest is being used by cach for the superfetch to move things around,,,, but as you can see vista has alot more processes running than xp & i have shut down all the one's i dont need,,,, i think this is why its sed that 2GIG of ram is better when using vista.


--------------------
Figgis,,,, LUFC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ryan_w_quick
post Dec 5 2007, 12:29 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 24-March 05
Member No.: 15,312



I find this very interesting, since in my area, pcs are being sold with windows vista and only 512 ram.


--------------------
"To do less than your best is to sacrifice the gift." Steve Prefontaine

"The things you own end up owning you." Tyler Durden

"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same god who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Galileo

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
figgis41
post Dec 6 2007, 11:16 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-May 07
From: Hull England
Member No.: 129,329



hi Ryan,,,, when vista was first being lanched all the big pc shops in the uk were offering free vista upgrades for all xp machines purchased around that time, most of these machines did'nt have more than 1 gig of ram & the lower end pc's only had 512 of ram,,,, so all these people who got one are going to be very disapointed when they also have to ramp up there ram at extra expence,,,, it dose'nt say that vista will not work without 2 gig but it works alot better with it,,,,, i wonder if the shops passed this info on to there coustamers befor purchase ??????? i doubt it.


--------------------
Figgis,,,, LUFC
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
usasma
post Dec 6 2007, 04:20 PM
Post #11


Still visually handicapped, new avatar :0)
******

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 15,531
Joined: 2-October 05
From: Southeastern CT, USA
Member No.: 35,824



Vista Home Basic will work OK on just 512 mB of RAM - but once you start using it, it'll bog down quickly. I've had Ultimate running on 512 mB of RAM (in the beta) and it worked OK with some performance tweaks - as did Ultimate with 1 gB of RAM.

From what I'm seeing at work (and at home) - 2 gB is the "sweet spot" right now. Enough performance that you don't have to worry constantly - yet affordable enough for most people. I suspect that it's gonna need more as the installations mature tho' - which leads to a problem with DDR2 in dual channel mode for the 32 bit versions. That version won't recognize 4 gB of RAM (although it's working on 2 of my home systems) - so what will people do when faced with that decision?

FWIW - I think that the 64 bit OS's are just starting to come into their own - and that we'll see more and more of them as 32 bit Vista reaches it's peak at 3.26 gB of RAM.


--------------------
- John
**If you need a more detailed explanation, please ask for it. I have the Knack. **
BTW - the avatar pic is a camel as it looks back at me while I'm in the saddle (and he wasn't happy!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th January 2009 - 03:37 AM


Advertise   |   About Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Contact Us   |   Site Map   |   Chat   |   Tutorials   |   Uninstall List
Discussion Forums   |   The Computer Glossary   |   Resources   |   RSS Feeds   |   Startups   |   The File Database   |   Malware Removal Guides

© 2003-2008 All Rights Reserved Bleeping Computer LLC.