Welcome Guest ( Log In | Click here to Register a free account now! )
Welcome to Bleeping Computer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.![]() ![]() |
Nov 26 2007, 03:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Hardware Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: BC Advisor Posts: 1,872 Joined: 25-January 07 From: Tiffin, Ohio Member No.: 108,353 |
Processor: Type : Intel Celeron Internal Specification : Intel® Celeron® CPU 2.70GHz Codename : Northwood Revision : D1 Technology : 0.13µ CPU ID : F.2.9 CPU IDEx : F.2.9 Brand ID : A Microcode : MU0F292E This post has been edited by Sneakycyber: Nov 26 2007, 04:46 PM -------------------- ~Chad~ Biostar P4M900-M4, Celeron 2.7GHZ OCD 2.95, 2GB patriot DDR2 667 CL3, 60,20 GB IDE HDD,2 Dell 19" Flat Panel monitors, XFX 512mb OC'd Geforce 9500, Windows XP Professional SP2, SAS, MBAM, MCAFEE STINGER, Zonealarm, Linksys Router, and A Modded Palm TX HandHeld. |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2007, 04:58 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 17-November 07 Member No.: 170,492 |
Have you checked the mb specs in more detail. Doesn't it say something about supported chipsets?
|
|
|
|
Nov 26 2007, 05:48 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Hardware Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: BC Advisor Posts: 1,872 Joined: 25-January 07 From: Tiffin, Ohio Member No.: 108,353 |
Thanks for the tip I Googled the chipset which is the VIA P4M900 and it states it supports the Celeron CPU. Phew I was afraid I may have to pay shipping and restocking fee
Edit: I also looked for the differences between the two processors and it seems the Celeron D has Hyperthreading a faster FSB, and I think more Chache. This post has been edited by Sneakycyber: Nov 26 2007, 05:50 PM -------------------- ~Chad~ Biostar P4M900-M4, Celeron 2.7GHZ OCD 2.95, 2GB patriot DDR2 667 CL3, 60,20 GB IDE HDD,2 Dell 19" Flat Panel monitors, XFX 512mb OC'd Geforce 9500, Windows XP Professional SP2, SAS, MBAM, MCAFEE STINGER, Zonealarm, Linksys Router, and A Modded Palm TX HandHeld. |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2007, 06:24 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 17-November 07 Member No.: 170,492 |
I was reading about L2 cache some time ago. Remember I was a bit surprised how much performance you could gain from a large cache.
When you go 64-bit, I don't think you'll feel much different if you do not run a 64-bit os. I'd advice Windows x64. Check there is all the drivers before you go ahead. I'm running mine with the native mouse driver and it a pain. When your on x64 things will really improve like moving files. 32-bit is gonna feel like ancient technology for you. If celeron D the 1st generation 64'er, then I think you'd be better of with a core2duo. Have fun with it. This post has been edited by nightspydk: Nov 26 2007, 06:26 PM |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2007, 07:26 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Hardware Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: BC Advisor Posts: 1,872 Joined: 25-January 07 From: Tiffin, Ohio Member No.: 108,353 |
I wasn't planning on going with a 64bit processor, But I am looking at the Phenom from AMD 4 cores and only 260 bucks.
-------------------- ~Chad~ Biostar P4M900-M4, Celeron 2.7GHZ OCD 2.95, 2GB patriot DDR2 667 CL3, 60,20 GB IDE HDD,2 Dell 19" Flat Panel monitors, XFX 512mb OC'd Geforce 9500, Windows XP Professional SP2, SAS, MBAM, MCAFEE STINGER, Zonealarm, Linksys Router, and A Modded Palm TX HandHeld. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th January 2009 - 03:29 AM |