Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help and Spyware Removal Computer Help Forums Windows Startup Programs Database Spyware and Malware Removal Guides Computer Tutorials Uninstall Database File Database Computer Glossary Computer Resources
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Click here to Register a free account now! )



Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com
Welcome to Bleeping Computer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.
Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> System Restore ; Keep Enabled Or Not When Known To Be Infected?
ruby1
post Nov 20 2007, 09:40 AM
Post #1


a forum member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,360
Joined: 27-August 07
Member No.: 153,171



what is the suggested practise on this forum
if you do have system restore enabled ,KEEP it running if you get infected ?
or disable system restore when there is an infection?

if system restore is NOT enabled and you get infected ,create a restore point ;

I ask this as I see on another thread it is mentioned that system restore is disabled as an infection is on the computer

as I understand it; it is far better to have an infected restore point to roll back to if necessary in the cleaning process than to have NO restore points at all?

what are this forum's suggestions ,views and opinions on this point please and the rationale for them

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
boopme
post Nov 20 2007, 11:38 AM
Post #2


To INSANITY and BEYOND !!
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 10,943
Joined: 10-September 04
From: NJ USA
Member No.: 2,608



As I understand and I'll pass along the explanation. It's better to have the infected point available. Once cleaned then you eliminate and create anew.

Unfortunately, some anti-virus vendors recommend disabling System Restore before attempting malware removal so many folks still follow that advice. Turning System Restore off and then turning it back on has some risk associated with it since that feature does not always work as intended. Further, there is always a possibility of something going wrong during the malware removal process and you end up with more problems. Without a restore point to fall back on, you are then stuck with a limited means of restoring your system such as a Repair Install or Reformat. Although System Restore is not 100% guaranteed to work all the time, it at least gives you another option. When the system is clean, then the OP can create a new Restore Point and purge the old ones to prevent accidental re-infection.

See "System Restore and malware removal - what is best practice? ".

Also read Quietman7's reply today here (post #2)

http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic117374.html

This post has been edited by boopme: Nov 20 2007, 11:43 AM
Reason for edit: Add`another link


--------------------
Can you spare some PC cycles to help FIND A CURE .. BC FOLDING TEAM Click me /info..
ThoughtVent a goodplace to discuss.<<>>>Staying Updated Calendar of Updates.
For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ruby1
post Nov 20 2007, 12:29 PM
Post #3


a forum member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,360
Joined: 27-August 07
Member No.: 153,171



thank you; I am therefore intruigued to know from which sourse
the comment on this thread
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic117206.html

that states in post number three


QUOTE
as per many suggestions I have seen on here, I have disabled system restore...


my personal view is that it far better to have an infected restore point to fall back on than none at all ; it the cleaning process goes awry, at least you HAVE SOMEWHERE to go back to ; with restore turned OFF you have ZILCH wacko.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
quietman7
post Nov 20 2007, 01:18 PM
Post #4


Bleepin' Janitor
******

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 14,074
Joined: 9-July 05
From: Virginia, USA
Member No.: 26,513



QUOTE
I am therefore intruigued to know from which sourse the comment on this thread

QUOTE
as per many suggestions I have seen on here, I have disabled system restore



Thats the way things were routinely done in the past. Unfortunately, some anti-virus vendors still recommend doing this before attempting malware removal and many folks follow that advice.


--------------------
"THE BAD GUYS DON'T NEED A SEARCH WARRANT. ARE YOU PROTECTED?"

Microsoft MVP - Windows Security 2007-2009
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th January 2009 - 12:47 AM


Advertise   |   About Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Contact Us   |   Site Map   |   Chat   |   Tutorials   |   Uninstall List
Discussion Forums   |   The Computer Glossary   |   Resources   |   RSS Feeds   |   Startups   |   The File Database   |   Malware Removal Guides

© 2003-2008 All Rights Reserved Bleeping Computer LLC.