BleepingComputer.com: Riaa Loses In Precedent-setting Case

How to use this Forum

HI! Please do not use this General Chat forum for computer support questions. If you are looking for support, please post your question in the appropriate forum. For HijackThis logs please post your log here:

Virus, Trojan, Spyware, and Malware Removal Logs

Welcome to the site and looking forward to your introduction posts!

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Riaa Loses In Precedent-setting Case

#1 no one

Distinguished Member

Group: Members
Posts: 843
Joined: 09-May 06
Gender:Male
Location:PCLinuxOS Land

Posted 19 September 2007 - 11:15 PM

Quote

A judge in Southern California made no friends in the RIAA when she handed down a precedent-setting verdict that cleared the defendant all charges in the case Interscope v. Rodriguez.
http://www.dailytech.com/RIAA+Loses+in+Pre...article8884.htm

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster" Posted Image

#2 ddeerrff

Retired

Group: Malware Response Team
Posts: 2,541
Joined: 13-September 04
Gender:Male
Location:Wisconsin, US

Posted 19 September 2007 - 11:27 PM

About time.

Derfram
~~~~~~

#3 BlackSpyder

Bleeping Big Rig

Group: BC Advisor
Posts: 2,366
Joined: 23-January 06
Gender:Male
Location:Huddleston, VA USA (Home Sweet Home)

Posted 19 September 2007 - 11:30 PM

woot!!! sorry to overfilled with joy on this case to say much else.

#4 Yourhighness

The BSG Malware Fighter

Group: Malware Response Team
Posts: 7,927
Joined: 20-April 06
Gender:Male
Location:Hamburg

Posted 19 September 2007 - 11:50 PM

Finally. About time too.

"How did I get infected?" - "Safe-hex" - Member of UNITE -
Posted Image

#5 oldf@rt

Forum Addict

Group: Members
Posts: 2,609
Joined: 06-November 05
Gender:Male
Location:Avondale, Arizona USA

Posted 20 September 2007 - 01:57 AM

Here is the link to the Actual document It is not over, yet!.

The name says it all -- 59 and holding permanently

**WARNING** _{Links I provide might cause brain damage}

#6 Andrew

Bleepin' Night Watchman

Group: Moderator
Posts: 7,422
Joined: 05-December 05
Gender:Not Telling
Location:Right behind you

Posted 20 September 2007 - 06:41 AM

As has been said already: it's about bloody time!

The judge did give the RIAA 30 days to amend their complaint though. I wonder if they'll bother or whether they actually have anything that can be added.

Help us help you. If HelpBot replies, you MUST follow step 1 in its reply so we know you need help.
Posted Image

Boredom Software Stop Highlighting Things

#7 rms4evr

Distinguished Member

Group: Members
Posts: 811
Joined: 11-October 05
Gender:Female
Location:East Coast

Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:36 PM

Hallelujah. Next time, get some actual evidence, please!! :thumbsup:

#8 dc3

Recalcitrant

Group: Members
Posts: 9,478
Joined: 04-March 05
Gender:Not Telling

Posted 20 September 2007 - 09:02 PM

The major point is that there was not a precedent set, YES!

#9 rigel

FD-BC

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 12,748
Joined: 21-October 04
Gender:Male
Location:South Carolina - USA

Posted 22 September 2007 - 11:15 AM

Yes!

"In a world where you can be anything, be yourself." ~ unknown
"Fall in love with someone who deserves your heart. Not someone who plays with it. – Will Smith