Did we really land on the moon?

I wish that NASA would launch people on to the moon one more time, just so that they can prove people have been on the moon. Then again, with today's technology, that would probably be easy!

Here is a story my history/psychology teacher in high school told me. I dont have a source or quote.

The craft that actually landed on the moon was built to land on a much softer surface than what the moon is. You see, the scientists at NASA had calculated that the dust would be many feet thick, due to a long period of time with no disruptions. However, there was only six inches of dust where the craft landed. The astronauts reported the tough landing an everything.

It just seems like such an extremely well planned and performed hoax, with so many fake details, and no one who was in on it has told, that I for one, do not think our government could have pulled off

What a great breeze blows the flag on the moon!!!
Didn't you know there are lots of air on the Moon???
What a great hoax!!!

Did we really land on the moon? Do you believe the USA actually landed there?

Since your link only opens a Spanish version of You-Tube, I can only assume that you are referring to the flag sticking out from the post, instead of hanging limply. That is because there is a stiff piece of wire at the top of the flag holding it out.

Of course, I suppose finding out the facts is too hard for you, as it is for so many other morons.

One of the problems with NASA, as well as nearly everyone else on the planet, is that they think in terms of vehicles that launch from and return to the Earth. It would be far more economical to build a vehicle in space that will always stay in space. A vehicle that travels from Earth-orbit to Lunar orbit and back. Fueling, crewing, maintenance,etc. - all done in space. We need space vehicles that are just that - space vehicles. And the Shuttle program can be scaled down. It may look cool, but in reality it would be far less expensive, with faster turn-around times if a passenger to orbit shuttle system were developed, leaving freight shipments to unmanned cargo rockets. So you freight spacecraft components to orbit, and shuttle up the mechanics and engineers required to put them together. Then freight up the fuel, shuttle up the crew, and away they go.

There have been 222 posts on this topic.

DSTM is right, I'm not too bothered what happened

Maybe you should be writing on another thread then.

To everyone else, let's see a link to something which proves that man didn't land on the moon.

Does it really matter?

If the topic is about whether or not man landed on the moon then why would someone who doesn't care keep posting.

Also, I am also allowed to express my opinion that he should try another thread..

It does, because we have the right to know all the truth. We are in a age of great changes and one of the reasons for these changes was another great hoax, the 9/11.
If you remember, this event was one of the reasons why USA invade the Iraqi soil based on a bunch of lies about the WMD that this country had. The result of this act were millions of deaths and billions of dolars in profits for a few business ventures.
So, I think we have reached the moment of truth. Don't you agree DSTM?

We are in a age of great changes and one of the reasons for these changes was another great hoax, the 9/11.

So the people I knew that were in those buildings on that day are not really dead?

If I were to say what I am truly thinking right now this post would be deleted and I would receive a warning from admin.

It does, because we have the right to know all the truth. We are in a age of great changes and one of the reasons for these changes was another great hoax, the 9/11.

What real benefit, has been gained, by landing on the moon?

The same benefit gained from climbing high mountains, sailing single-handedly around the world, swimming the channel, etc. etc.

Dead Right, Mate!

Hoax? So the people I knew that were in those buildings on that day are not really dead? The whole thing was just a Steven Spielberg production?

If I were to say what I am truly thinking right now this post would be deleted and I would receive a warning from admin.

I'm still asking myself 'why'. Perhaps "because we can"?

Why did the flag wave on the moon, if there is no wind and atmosphere there?

If it is real, why weren't there any stars in the background of the movie?

The sun was shining. Cameras were set for daylight exposure, and could not detect the faint points of light. Even the brightest stars are dim and difficult to see in the daytime on the Moon. Harrison Schmitt saw no stars from the Moon.

Why wasn't there a blast crater on the moon from when it landed?

No crater should be expected. The Descent Propulsion System was throttled very far down during the final landing. The Lunar Module was no longer rapidly decelerating, so the descent engine only had to support the module's own weight, diminished by the 1/6 g lunar gravity and by the near exhaustion of the descent propellants. At landing, the engine thrust divided by the nozzle exit area is only about 10 kilopascals (1.5 PSI)[44], p. 164. Beyond the engine nozzle, the plume spreads and the pressure drops very rapidly. (In comparison the Saturn V F-1 first stage engines produced 3.2 MPa (459 PSI) at the mouth of the nozzle.) Rocket exhaust gases expand much more rapidly after leaving the engine nozzle in a vacuum than in an atmosphere. The effect of an atmosphere on rocket plumes can be easily seen in launches from Earth; as the rocket rises through the thinning atmosphere, the exhaust plumes broaden very noticeably. To reduce this, rocket engines designed for vacuum operation have longer bells than those designed for use at the Earth's surface, but they still cannot prevent this spreading. The Lunar Module's exhaust gases therefore expanded rapidly well beyond the landing site. However, the descent engines did scatter a lot of very fine surface dust as seen in 16mm movies of each landing, and many mission commanders commented on its effect on visibility. The landers were generally moving horizontally as well as vertically, and photographs do show scouring of the surface along the final descent path. Finally, the lunar soil is very compact below its surface dust layer, further making it impossible for the descent engine to blast out a "crater".

The hoax is the official propaganda of Bush Administration about the killers...

The next manned Moon mission planned for 2018...